"Matthew Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Kip,
> Xen support will be MFC'd when it proves to be sufficiently stable for
> some uses. It probably won't make the freeze for 7.1. Xen 3.2 is the
> initial target.
Dom0/DomU or DomU only please ?
Regards
Éric Masson
--
tétu comme un mule :) E
"Kip Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DomU only to start off with. The currently planned progression is:
> stabilize in HEAD -> SMP -> x86_64 -> dom0
Great, Thanks a lot for your work :)
Éric Masson
--
Vous faites chier avec vos annonces à la con ! Ou sont les modérateurs
? Ca se dégr
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Matthew Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Kip,
>
>> Xen support will be MFC'd when it proves to be sufficiently stable for
>> some uses. It probably won't make the freeze for 7.1. Xen 3.2 is the
>> initial target.
>
>
2008/8/17 Matthew Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see commits to Xen framework in SVN so I'd like to ask what is its
>>> current status? Is it still as described in
>>> http://wiki.freebsd.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see commits to Xen framework in SVN so I'd like to ask what is its
>> current status? Is it still as described in
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen ? Will it be MFC-ed before 7.1-RELEAS
On Sunday 17 August 2008 20:32:03 Artem Naluzhnyy wrote:
> I have 6.1-RELEASE system with lots of processes in production. Is
> there any way to determine which process causes high syscall rate? No
> kernel upgrade or sizeable downtime allowed.
see ktrace(1)
--
/"\ Best regards,
Hi,
I have 6.1-RELEASE system with lots of processes in production. Is
there any way to determine which process causes high syscall rate? No
kernel upgrade or sizeable downtime allowed.
--
Artem Naluzhnyy
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
Guillaume Ballet wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guillaume Ballet wrote:
Hello hackers,
I am currently working on a small project and would like to add a few
commands to the set that is available in ddb.
I found that very interesting albe
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 05:17:54PM +, Guillaume Ballet wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Guillaume Ballet wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello hackers,
> >>
> >> I am currently working on a small project and would like to add a few
> >> commands to the s
>>
>> It is indeed doable: Here are the diffs for a first attempt at doing
>> this. I am not entirely satisfied with it, though, as it does not work
>> with DB_SHOW_COMMAND and the likes... Also, I have to declare a lot of
>> ddb-related stuff into kern_linker.c and I don't like it. I am
>> current
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guillaume Ballet wrote:
>>
>> Hello hackers,
>>
>> I am currently working on a small project and would like to add a few
>> commands to the set that is available in ddb.
>>
>> I found that very interesting albeit succinct p
Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
I see commits to Xen framework in SVN so I'd like to ask what is its
current status? Is it still as described in
http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen ? Will it be MFC-ed before 7.1-RELEASE?
One more question: Which version of Xen will be supported? The wiki
mentions 3.0
Hi,
I see commits to Xen framework in SVN so I'd like to ask what is its
current status? Is it still as described in
http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen ? Will it be MFC-ed before 7.1-RELEASE?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
