Re: Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:53:41 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:34:19 -0700, "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi hackers, >> I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. >> Is there any possibility where a mountpoint

Re: Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:34:19 -0700, "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi hackers, > I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. > Is there any possibility where a mountpoint be any value other > than a directory, a symlink, or "none", i.e. a flat file? > Thank

New Mailinglist: freebsd-wip-status@

2008-06-09 Thread Max Laier
Hello everybody, SHORT SUMMARY: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wip-status Subscribe today!! Tell all your friends, co-workers and everybody you know who's interested in FreeBSD. Post this on your blog! ;) LONG VERSION: if you've been around lately you might already know ab

Re: Kerberos support in NFSv4

2008-06-09 Thread Derek Taylor
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008, Zachary Loafman wrote: >Isilon Systems is sponsoring RPCSEC_GSS work for FreeBSD soon. I expect >that we'll have it CURRENT later this year. We don't really have any >plans to glue it into the v4 client just yet, we're targeting Kerberized >NFSv3 first. We are looking at NFSv4

Re: timestamping for kernel messages (like Solaris and Linux)

2008-06-09 Thread Ivan Voras
Niki Denev wrote: > I'm looking at a Linux machine right now, and it looks like > they use the time since boot (actually uptime) for the timestamps. Debian or Ubuntu, right? I think RedHat uses absolute time (hh:mm:ss). > Anyways, does this sound like something that FreeBSD should have? > It cou

Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
Hi hackers, I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. Is there any possibility where a mountpoint be any value other than a directory, a symlink, or "none", i.e. a flat file? Thanks, -Garrett References: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/124409 (not fully

Re: openssl with zlib support

2008-06-09 Thread Mohacsi Janos
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2008.06.06 19:02:36 +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote: Dear All, Are there any reason to not enabling zlib compression for TLS in openssl on FreeBSD ? No, that seems like a mistake. Which FreeBSD version are you using, and are you using Open