On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:52:56PM +0800, Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our nfs server is running 7-stable/amd64 with 8G ram, the size of zfs
>> pool is 12T. We have set vm.kmem_size and vm.kmem_size_max to
>> 1.5G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am having problems with the git out of ports git-fetch keeps on
>> dumping
>> core when I try update of xorg (the initial checkout works ok). I'm running
>> FreeBSD-current ...
* Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with the git out of ports git-fetch keeps on dumping
> core when I try update of xorg (the initial checkout works ok). I'm running
> FreeBSD-current ... does anyone have any idea why this might be?
>
> When I try to do a gdb -c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am having problems with the git out of ports git-fetch keeps on dumping
core when I try update of xorg (the initial checkout works ok). I'm running
FreeBSD-current ... does anyone have any idea why this might be?
When I try to do a gdb -c cor
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>
>> This adds support for /etc/pkg.conf configuration file.
>> Also, this adds support for naive multi-site package fetching.
>>
>> Any comment welcome (and appreciated).
>>
>> Patch is here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello;
I started playing a bit with net/pppd23 and I noticed there are some patches for
FreeBSD-3.0 that were never committed (NetBSD certainly has them). Our pppd(8) is derived
from the "samba" pppd port and should have them if we want to continue updating
it.
E
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008, Harti Brandt wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Derek Taylor wrote:
>
>DT>On Thu, 22 May 2008, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>DT>>Derek Taylor wrote:
>DT>>> This question was previously posed of the freebsd-questions list, but
>DT>>> with no response for a week, I'd like to try my luck here.
Hello;
I started playing a bit with net/pppd23 and I noticed there are some patches
for FreeBSD-3.0 that were never committed (NetBSD certainly has them). Our
pppd(8) is derived from the "samba" pppd port and should have them if we want
to continue updating it.
I started adapting them but I am
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Derek Taylor wrote:
DT>On Thu, 22 May 2008, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
DT>>Derek Taylor wrote:
DT>>> This question was previously posed of the freebsd-questions list, but
DT>>> with no response for a week, I'd like to try my luck here. If there's
DT>>> any more information I should
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:52:56PM +0800, Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our nfs server is running 7-stable/amd64 with 8G ram, the size of zfs
> pool is 12T. We have set vm.kmem_size and vm.kmem_size_max to
> 1.5G, but the kernel still panics by "kmem_map too small" often.
Could you also try to d
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>Derek Taylor wrote:
>> This question was previously posed of the freebsd-questions list, but
>> with no response for a week, I'd like to try my luck here. If there's
>> any more information I should include, please speak up: I would be glad
>> to oblige.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:07:15 -0400, Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:33 AM +0200 6/3/08, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
>>>
I have an old patch that makes kqueue monitor every file write on
the system and return the inode number in t
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I think there's also considerable overlap with other kernel event systems,
such as audit, and we might benefit from thinking seriously about enhancing
those event systems rather than introducing a new one. The design of
fsevents is pretty much entirel
Robert Watson wrote:
fsevents allows user processes to subscribe, effectively on a
per-filesystem basis, to namespace and file close operations.
...
I think there's also considerable overlap with other kernel event
systems, such as audit, and we might benefit from thinking seriously
about e
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
I remember a discussion of changes to MacOS10 in Leopard which made it
easier to implement features such as Spotlight and TimeMachine. The
description starts here, I think:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/mac-os-x-10-5.ars/7
the section on file
On Fri, 30 May 2008 16:37:00 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > for those of us who're booting off a stripped down freebsd and are not
> > using the 4th routines, are the above to be set before 'load /kernel'
> > or after 'load /kernel' ?
>
> It doesn't matter. The tu
16 matches
Mail list logo
