information buffer of NIC

2008-04-27 Thread Israel Lehnen Silva
Hello! I need information of load of buffer NICs Yours have one suggestion? Muito obrigado. -- Att. Israel Lehnen Silva ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: indent(1) support for gcc(1) 0b prefix

2008-04-27 Thread Joshua Isom
On Apr 26, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Romain Tartière wrote: Hello FreeBSD hackers! I'm using avr-gcc from the ports and relying on the 0b prefix notation for binary constants, that is: foo = 0b00101010; Thanks to /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc/files/patch-0b-constants this is possible :-) But I w

Re: indent(1) support for gcc(1) 0b prefix

2008-04-27 Thread Romain Tartière
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:20:53PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > By inserting whitespace, indent(1) is changing the syntax of the input > and, IMHO, indent should not be doing that - its brief is to > re-arrange whitespace to (hopefully) improve legibility, not make > syntactic changes. > > I would

[patch] savecore can't create dump from encrypted swap

2008-04-27 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
Issue was mentioned recently on stable@ http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47F548D9.8060905 The problem is in order of rc.d scripts. After encswap finishes it's impossible to open original (not encrypted) swap device for write so savecore fails. The following patch adds 'encswap' target to be r

RE: My GSoC Intro...

2008-04-27 Thread Sam Xia
hi Przemek, I am very interested at what you are going to do. Could you tell me what kind of chips are used in GSoC. (I mean that the chip is made by Freesacle or by the others.) Best Regards, Sam Xia > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: indent(1) support for gcc(1) 0b prefix

2008-04-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:01:53AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: >On Saturday 26 April 2008 23:35:57 Romain Tartière wrote: >> I'm using avr-gcc from the ports and relying on the 0b prefix notation >> for binary constants, that is: >> >> foo = 0b00101010; ... >I can't think of a case (outside of "0x