Hi Everyone,
The FreeBSD Status Reports for the Fourth Quarter of 2007 are now
available at:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2007-10-2007-12.html
Regards,
Brad Davis
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On 11:58:52 Feb 17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Come on, guys, simple yes or no would be enough for me :-)
>
Okay. I am going to give my free advice.
You obviously know what that means. Please take it with a pinch of salt.
> on 14/02/2008 22:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > Dear hackers,
>
on 17/02/2008 18:19 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> Hi,
>
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I cannot tell you if this is still the same for modern designs.
>
>> ... -> iret -> interrupted again
>
> This was the behaviour earlier.
>> Is this a deterministic behavior ? Or some timings are at play?
Hi,
Andriy Gapon wrote:
I cannot tell you if this is still the same for modern designs.
... -> iret -> interrupted again
This was the behaviour earlier.
Is this a deterministic behavior ? Or some timings are at play?
The PIC should never release the Interrupt signal to the CPU as long as
The following question might more relevant to some different mailing
list that is not freebsd-specific, but I think my chances are pretty
high here too.
I read a bunch of docs on x86, on interrupts and a spec of 8259A. And
while I think I have a pretty good idea how interrupts work in x86-based
sy
Come on, guys, simple yes or no would be enough for me :-)
on 14/02/2008 22:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Dear hackers,
> I'd like to check with you if my understanding of some code is correct.
>
> If we speak about a typical older i386 system, with UP and "AT" PIC, I
> think this is how
6 matches
Mail list logo
