Yuri wrote:
When I am trying to understand how Elf executable works I am only getting to few
pages with very fragmentary information.
Googling many constants like R_386_PC32, R_386_TLS_LD only yields some
discussion references and code.
Anybody knows where to read more about the Elf format? Doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Nielsen wrote:
> Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I was wondering ... I have (I think) nvidia working on my box, or at
>> least, I am calling out the nvidia driver in the xorg.conf, but I was
>> wondering if there is any program that on
On 2008-01-16 16:06:56 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, this might only fix the issue with yacc if I'm thinking correctly,
> because the lexer also needs to be told about this for reentrancy. (But
> perhaps a much smaller problem since it's a matter of updating the lex
On ons, jan 16, 2008 at 02:39:26pm +, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16 Jan 2008, at 13:32, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Why do you want prefixing? And precisely what do you want to do with
>>> parameters?
>>>
>> Prefixi
Hi,
On 16 Jan 2008, at 13:32, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
[...]
Why do you want prefixing? And precisely what do you want to do with
parameters?
Prefixing is needed since csup already have a configuration parser
written in
lex/yacc and
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:41:47AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Ulf Lilleengen, and lo! it spake thus:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
> >
> > > Why do you want prefixing?
> >
> > Prefixing is need
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Ulf Lilleengen, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> > Why do you want prefixing?
>
> Prefixing is needed since csup already have a configuration parser
> written in lex/yacc and there
On 2008-01-16 10:33:02 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, the base system already have flex, but the flex version in base is
> heavily
> outdated (version 2.5.4 versus 2.5.34 in ports) and does not support
> reentrancy.
> Is there a reason why it's outdated? What I can thin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16 Jan 2008, at 09:33, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
>
>> Hello hackers,
>>
>> As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the last
>> couple
>> of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:48:27PM +1300, Atom Smasher wrote:
> i've got this running in one term:
> systat -iostat 1
> and this in another term:
> dd if=/dev/acd0 bs=2048 count=123456 | md5
>
> apparently the system only knows about throughput of mounted disks?
It doesn't seem to kno
i've got this running in one term:
systat -iostat 1
and this in another term:
dd if=/dev/acd0 bs=2048 count=123456 | md5
apparently the system only knows about throughput of mounted disks?
is that a bug or a feature?
--
...atom
http://atom.sm
Hi,
On 16 Jan 2008, at 09:33, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
Hello hackers,
As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the
last couple
of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not mean
it will
work perfect :)), but I encountered some issues regarding the
i
Hello hackers,
As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the last couple
of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not mean it will
work perfect :)), but I encountered some issues regarding the inclusion of my
lex and yacc files that I would like to discuss
13 matches
Mail list logo
