Re: Linux version of libusb that works with FreeBSD

2007-12-16 Thread Mike Meyer
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:26:58 +1030 "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast? > ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD.. Well, the devel/libusb port builds out of the box for me. It's used by a number of image

Linux version of libusb that works with FreeBSD

2007-12-16 Thread Daniel O'Connor
I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast? ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD.. The reason I'd like it is that I want to use this http://rmdir.de/~michael/xilinx/ in FreeBSD so I can talk to a USB JTAG cable. The thing I am not sure about is how ioct

Re: Disk sync at shutdown and fusefs filesystems

2007-12-16 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:21:53 +0100 Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> They have already discovered issues with system shutdown on Linux, and > >> Miklos has implemented a solution for this dubbed as "synchronous > >> umount". According to this, the protocol is enhanced with a new message >

Re: Disk sync at shutdown and fusefs filesystems

2007-12-16 Thread Csaba Henk
On 2007-12-12, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:00:07 +0100 > Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 2007-12-11, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The problem with NTFS-3G (and all other FUSE based drivers maybe) is >> > that it doesn't flus

RE: kqueue and libev

2007-12-16 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Julian Elischer wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > James Mansion wrote: > >> [ On the libev being unhappy with kqueue ] > >> ... > >> It looks like a decent library, but these comments seem > unfortunate. > >> Does anyone know what the author is concerned about? > > > > he's just plain misinform

Behaviour of send()

2007-12-16 Thread Ivan Voras
Hi, If the SO_SNDBUF option is set on a TCP socket with some size N, and assuming nothing is queued for sending yet, is it safe to assume send() won't block while attempting to send a block whose size is <= N, even if the socket is in "blocking" mode? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: kqueue and libev

2007-12-16 Thread Bert JW Regeer
On Dec 15, 2007, at 08:47 , Kip Macy wrote: On 12/15/07, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod): unsigned int ev_recommended_backends () Return the set of all backends compiled