Alex Dupre wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I guess I might be wrong, but I have to say, wrapping everything really
does seem to me to be the hack.
Call it a wrapper, call it a symlink, but it seems to me that you don't
like linux libs in LOCALBASE *and* you don't like executable references
in LOCALB
> > It looks like a decent library, but these comments seem unfortunate.
> > Does anyone know what the author is concerned about?
>
> he's just plain misinformed
>
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
___
freebsd-hacker
Julian Elischer wrote:
James Mansion wrote:
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for
James Mansion wrote:
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for this platform. This set
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:20:22PM +0300, Lenar Tukhvatullin wrote:
> > We are experiencing a problem with BCM5721 bge interfaces, which seems to
> > be able to receive at almost 1Gbps but can only transmit at < 540Mbps.
> Hello, can you test patch from Igor Sysoev with recommended tunables?
> ht
Actually, until recently it was broken on pipes. We've never received
any PRs to that effect so there is no way of knowing. You'll have
better luck asking the author himself.
-Kip
On 12/15/07, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:51:20AM +, James Mansion wrote:
>Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it
>was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with
>anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course
>its completely
On 15/12/2007, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |EVBACKEND_KQUEUE| (value 8, most BSD clones)
> Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it
> was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with
> anything but sockets and pipes, except on
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for this platform. This set is often smaller
th
9 matches
Mail list logo
