On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
/usr/ports/print/pdftk/
that's a good first choice, but if it doesn't work (amd64) then a second
choice is print/pdfjam and/or print/psutils-(letter|a4)... and ghostscript
for pdf2ps and/or ps2pdf... but yeah, pdftk is best if it works
Robert Watson wrote:
> I've updated the procstat(1) kernel patch and userland tool; the updated
> version can be found at:
>
> http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20071127-procstat.tgz
>
> The new version includes a number of changes from the old version,
> includ
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:18:47PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> The last of these required new kernel changes, including an MD component.
> I've tested the MD parts only on i386, although I have quick hacks at what
> they should look like on amd64, arm, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v. I don't
> promi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>
> I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of
> -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc
> instead of
> mergemaster... if so any idea
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of
- -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc
instead of
mergemaster... if so any ideas on doing it cleanly?
-
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 7:03 PM, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 01:08:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why was the device removed completely?
Can I simply do this? (want to be sure as this box is remote)
gmir
0n Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:27:41PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs. I also have
a
>rather inconvenient throwback: I feel hugely more at home-reading
>documents in paper. What I'd kind of like to do would be able to perfo
I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs. I also
have a rather inconvenient throwback: I feel hugely more at home-reading
documents in paper. What I'd kind of like to do would be able to
perform cut'n'paste among different pdfs, 5 pages here, 10 pages there,
until I put to
On Nov 27, 2007 7:03 PM, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 01:08:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why was the device removed completely?
> >
> >
> > Can I simply do this? (want to be sure as this box is remote)
> >
> > gmirror forget data
> >
> > atacontrol a
Hi,
Thanks for all response, especially for Mr. Robert N M Watson
I read all , and i got a lot thing from conversation about this.
It's nice community, thanks once again.
Regards
Binto
> Roman Divacky wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
>> wrote:
>>>
>>
A non oficial patch is available for some freebsd versions.
I'm not relly in touch with this so you can take a look on this page
http://blog.cg.nu/?p=9 .
I hope this help
-ros
Steven Hartland wrote:
Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
What I'm looking to do is have a forwa
Hello,
A friend of me has submitted this PR and I promised him that I would
see if I could get it implemented. I couldn't find anybody directly
responsible for the ips/iprcm tools, so I throw it in here for
discussion.
>Description:
I've observed that linux apps running under the linuxulator
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 01:08:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This just happened on my server:
>
> Nov 22 03:21:11 sockeye kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2
> retries left) LBA=28892960
> Nov 22 03:21:11 sockeye kernel: ad0: WARNING - removed from configuration
> Nov 22 03:21:11 soc
Xin LI wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
Looking around this doesn't seem possible but is it?
FreeBSD does not support multiple IP nor IPv6 on jails at this moment,
unfortunately...
AFAIK there exists a patch by pjd@
If not, somebody could
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:31:22AM -0800, sourav das wrote:
> i m a new comer. i wrote a raw socket client
> using setsockopt (sock, IPPROTO_IP. IPHDRINCL, )using UDP. ihave followed
> MS_Press network programming . it is showing 19 bytes sent successfully. when
> trying to send more th
Hi Steven,
Although it is not possibly natively you could simulate it with pf
binat's for the two IPs.
It might not be workable for you depending on the purpose of the jails
however (?)
Cheers
Dominic
Steven Hartland wrote:
Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
What I'm lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
>
> What I'm looking to do is have a forward facing IP and
> an backwards facing IP in the same jail so it can
> talk to the internet and our back door systems.
>
> Looki
This just happened on my server:
Nov 22 03:21:11 sockeye kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries
left) LBA=28892960
Nov 22 03:21:11 sockeye kernel: ad0: WARNING - removed from configuration
Nov 22 03:21:11 sockeye kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0s1: provider ad0
disconnected.
Nov 22 03
Is it possible to create a jail with more than one IP?
What I'm looking to do is have a forward facing IP and
an backwards facing IP in the same jail so it can
talk to the internet and our back door systems.
Looking around this doesn't seem possible but is it?
Regards
Steve
=
Le Tuesday 27 November 2007, sourav das a écrit :
> hello all,
>
> i m a new comer. i wrote a raw socket client
> using setsockopt (sock, IPPROTO_IP. IPHDRINCL, )using UDP. ihave
> followed MS_Press network programming . it is showing 19 bytes sent
is this the best reference you found ? a
Dear all,
I've updated the procstat(1) kernel patch and userland tool; the updated
version can be found at:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20071127-procstat.tgz
The new version includes a number of changes from the old version, including:
- A number of bug fixes and cleanl
sourav das wrote:
> hello all,
>
> i m a new comer. i wrote a raw socket client
> using setsockopt (sock, IPPROTO_IP. IPHDRINCL, )using UDP. ihave followed
> MS_Press network programming . it is showing 19 bytes sent successfully. when
> trying to send more than 19 bytes using send
On Sunday 18 November 2007 05:43:45 pm Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:05:33AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Ok I finally have an amd64 smp box here that i can play with, and tried
> > to reproduce http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113430 - and I got
> > the following cra
On Monday 26 November 2007 03:52:13 pm Juri Mianovich wrote:
>
> --- Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Juri Mianovich wrote:
> >
> > > I am sorry to repost, but I cannot get any answer
> > on this from -net or
> > > -questions ... is there any answer to ge
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, vasanth raonaik wrote:
Is any one looking into this issue. Please mail me for more info.
Vasanth,
Could you file a problem report using send-pr on this problem? FreeBSD
hackers@ has a somewhat mixed subscription, and may not catch all the relevant
developers, and spit
hello all,
i m a new comer. i wrote a raw socket client
using setsockopt (sock, IPPROTO_IP. IPHDRINCL, )using UDP. ihave followed
MS_Press network programming . it is showing 19 bytes sent successfully. when
trying to send more than 19 bytes using sendto(sock, ...) function , it is
Hello All,
Is any one looking into this issue. Please mail me for more info.
On Nov 26, 2007 5:50 PM, vasanth raonaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> find_symdef() sometimes returns invalid value in def and a null in
> defobjout. This causes any binary to recieve a segmentation fa
27 matches
Mail list logo
