--- Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Juri Mianovich wrote:
>
> > I am sorry to repost, but I cannot get any answer
> on this from -net or
> > -questions ... is there any answer to getting this
> stat ? (see below)
Thank you for your explanation.
Since my ma
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Mohler
>
>On Nov 24, 2007 2:08 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joel V. wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > A big thanks to everyone who contacted me. FreeBSD really
>has the best
>> > community one could help for.
Hello Hackers,
find_symdef() sometimes returns invalid value in def and a null in
defobjout. This causes any binary to recieve a segmentation fault and
cores. I have recieved a core for rcp because of this issue. This
issue was also been raised by someothers in the list.
http://lists.freebsd.org/
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Baldur Gislason wrote:
Hi,
And since we're on this subject... is it possible to do IPSEC over UDP
tunnels in FreeBSD now? I have a couple of networks with dumb NAT and
need a way to tunnel out of them in a reliable manner.
only with the patch, not o
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Baldur Gislason wrote:
Hi,
And since we're on this subject... is it possible to do IPSEC over UDP
tunnels in FreeBSD now? I have a couple of networks with dumb NAT and
need a way to tunnel out of them in a reliable manner.
only with the patch, not out of the box.
--
Bjoe
And since we're on this subject... is it possible to do IPSEC over UDP
tunnels in FreeBSD now? I have a couple of networks with dumb NAT and
need a way to tunnel out of them in a reliable manner.
Baldur
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 04:08:54PM +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Quoting Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
No problem -- just to be clear: in 7, users can still choose between
libpthread (m:n) and libthr (1:1), but the default is now libthr rather than
libpthread, as libthr seemed to perform better in most if not all workloa
Hello,
Quoting Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No problem -- just to be clear: in 7, users can still choose between
> libpthread (m:n) and libthr (1:1), but the default is now libthr rather than
> libpthread, as libthr seemed to perform better in most if not all workloads
> of
> interest.
I
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
(Also when I run 4 threads with 2 cpus, each with hyperthreading, it goes
2.5 to 3 times faster - surprising since hyperthreading gets quite bad press
for its performance improvements - I should add that Linux didn't do at all
well at takin
2007/11/25, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
> has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
> typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
> Linux be
10 matches
Mail list logo
