* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best option right now is to read the code. There are some comments in
> both the headers and implementation.
Would it be useful to write manpages for these interfaces, or do we
assume that only godlike people can use them anyway? I am willing to
wri
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:57:16 -0600 Scott Long wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
> > here so it's only my imho.
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> >
> >> interrupt total
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
here so it's only my imho.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
interrupt total rate
irq6: fdc0 8 0
irq14: ata
Hi!
Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
here so it's only my imho.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> interrupt total rate
> irq6: fdc0 8 0
> irq14: ata0
On 10/17/07, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
> >
> > Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
> > one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
> > activity from the network activity for a clea
> > > >
> > > > the only indication I can see, is that one of the dump procs. is
> > > > waiting on
> > > > sbwait, and probably it's some deadlock, which is similar to what I
> > > > keep
> > > > seeing here, i'll try now with SCHED_ULE to see if it make a
> > > > difference.
> > >
> > >
> > >
6 matches
Mail list logo
