Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Randy Pratt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but > after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that > require the original port will be incorrect. This

Re: kern.ngroups question

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Vince
Julian Elischer wrote: Reuben A. Popp wrote: Hello all, Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set to 16 by default? NFS only supports this much by default (from memory). Samba (in the guise of Jeremy Allison) has asked us to follow Linux's lead and support an a

Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently me

Re: Proposal for alleviating disk read / write time

2007-07-18 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Clarifications and comments are more than welcome. I really appreciate it. Hmm, your requirements look more and more like a... database? :) [whistling away...] I know. The only c

FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE && apache 2.2.4 = bad performance. Help!

2007-07-18 Thread Michael Vaughn
Hello everyone, I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 uname: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE Fri Jun 22 12:17:03 UTC 2007 amd64 installed php modules: php5-5.2.3 PHP Scripting Language (Apache Module and

Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but > after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that > require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up > progra

Re: Proposal for alleviating disk read / write time

2007-07-18 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Clarifications and comments are more than welcome. I really appreciate it. Hmm, your requirements look more and more like a... database? :) [whistling away...] I know. The only catch is that the last time I brought up databas

Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports

2007-07-18 Thread Antony Mawer
On 18/07/2007 5:44 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: Antony Mawer wrote: On 18/07/2007 10:46 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me. After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then made a bunch of other p

Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f

2007-07-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up programs like portmanager. There is a sense in which one should never do "pkg

Re: ttyd0 permission denied problem

2007-07-18 Thread oxy
sorry, miss-clicked :) thanks for your help Jeremy Chadwick írta: On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:27:22PM +0200, oxy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev]# cu -l /dev/ttyd0 -s 115200 Connected so my problem is minicom? how can i give permission for it? when i did: 'chown uucp:dialer /dev/ttyd0' than i

Re: ttyd0 permission denied problem

2007-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:27:22PM +0200, oxy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev]# cu -l /dev/ttyd0 -s 115200 > Connected > > so my problem is minicom? how can i give permission for it? > when i did: 'chown uucp:dialer /dev/ttyd0' than it worked for > a couple minutes, than system changed back o

Re: Rijndael sanity check?

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Hodges
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 12:26 pm, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:06:35PM -0600, Richard Hodges wrote: > > > ./aes_test > > > > Using key: 2b 7e 15 16 28 ae d2 a6 ab f7 15 88 09 cf 4f 3c > > > > 920F0CE0A9A96BB9D8416962BDBBAA7C > > decr: 92 0f 0c e0 a9 a9 6b b9 d8 41 69 62 b

Rijndael sanity check?

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Hodges
Okay, I am a little bit puzzled. I have been working with AES/Rijndael for a couple months now, and I have just run into something interesting. I have written two AES 128-bit implementations, one in C and one for a microcontroller. I have carefully studied various references, including FIPS-1

Re: ttyd0 permission denied problem

2007-07-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:47:55PM +0200, oxy wrote: > hi! > > i have exactly the same problem: > > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2006-07/msg00050.html > > is there any solution? i need serial console, and i can't figure out what's > wrong.. Do you see the same

ttyd0 permission denied problem

2007-07-18 Thread oxy
hi! i have exactly the same problem: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2006-07/msg00050.html is there any solution? i need serial console, and i can't figure out what's wrong.. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Proposal for alleviating disk read / write time

2007-07-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Garrett Cooper wrote: >Clarifications and comments are more than welcome. I really > appreciate it. Hmm, your requirements look more and more like a... database? :) [whistling away...] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Tar output mode for installworld

2007-07-18 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
On Tue, 17.07.2007 at 13:00:20 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Probably the best way to do this is to pre-cache the data with an > /etc/rc.d script. Write a little program to do it or build it as a > script. Inode numbers for files on a CD tend to reflect the location That is an inter

Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports

2007-07-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11 -0500): I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me. After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then made a bunch of other ports,

Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports

2007-07-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11 -0500): I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me. After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then made a bunch of other ports,

Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports

2007-07-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11 -0500): > I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me. > > After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then > made a bunch of other ports, if you go back to the

Proposal for alleviating disk read / write time

2007-07-18 Thread Garrett Cooper
Hello Kirill and Hackers, After reviewing the changes I made last weekend to pkg_install I'm seeing slight improvements, but not a large amount of improvement in overall program operation. I haven't implemented mmap(2) yet as John Baldwin suggested (need to do some reading about fcntl(2) to

hi, I'm a hacker!!!

2007-07-18 Thread Theom Rad
ha ha ha!!! ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Slight problem with make actual-package-depends with ports

2007-07-18 Thread Garrett Cooper
Antony Mawer wrote: On 18/07/2007 10:46 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me. After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then made a bunch of other ports, if you go back to the original port and