On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Tim Kientzle said:
One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
* Open the archive
* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
guaranteed to always be first in the archive)
I can only concur with that. In m
On Friday 06 July 2007 02:59:39 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 01:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007 04:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 July 2007 03:31:59 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 19:35, John-Mark Gur
Tim Kientzle said:
> One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
> libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
>* Open the archive
>* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
> guaranteed to always be first in the archive)
I can only concur with that. In my program
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my
and DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close
al
-I tried ... buffering ... the +CONTENTS file parsing function, and the
majority of the time it yielded good results
One approach I prototyped sometime back was to use
libarchive in pkg_add as follows:
* Open the archive
* Read +CONTENTS directly into memory (it's
guaranteed to alwa
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my
Ed Schouten wrote:
* LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
implemen
Tim Kientzle wrote:
I'm currently running a gamut of tests (500 tests, per package --
128 total on my server), and outputting all data to CSV files to
interpret later, using another Perl script to interpret calculated
averages and standard deviations.
Excellent! Much-needed work.
Usin
I'm currently running a gamut of tests (500 tests, per package --
128 total on my server), and outputting all data to CSV files to
interpret later, using another Perl script to interpret calculated
averages and standard deviations.
Excellent! Much-needed work.
Using basic printf(2)'s w
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:27:49PM -0400, Ighighi Ighighi wrote:
> It is implemented with the F_CLOSEM fcntl() available since version 2.0.
I don't like the fcntl(2) approach as it applies actions to more than
the passed in fd. That feels like an interface abuse.
Joerg
___
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:18:14PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> - closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
> open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
> implementation, this is Solaris's behavior).
I think this is a bad idea as -1 is generally an invalid f
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:50:17PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> Solaris side-steps this issue by simply auditing the individual close()
> system calls. My preference would be that we implement this in user space
> also, which would likewise generate a series of audit events, one for each
> sys
LI Xin wrote:
Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
DragonFly's implementation:
- closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
implementation, this is Solaris's behavior).
- my
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, LI Xin wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:27:49PM -0400, Ighighi Ighighi wrote:
The closefrom() call, available in Solaris, is present in NetBSD since
version 3.0. It is implemented with the F_CLOSEM fcntl() available since
version 2.0.
You co
* LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and
> DragonFly's implementation:
>
> - closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all
> open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland
> implementation, th
Hi,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:27:49PM -0400, Ighighi Ighighi wrote:
>> The closefrom() call, available in Solaris, is present in NetBSD since
>> version 3.0.
>> It is implemented with the F_CLOSEM fcntl() available since version 2.0.
>
> You could also add a system ca
On Friday 06 July 2007 01:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 July 2007 04:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007 03:31:59 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 19:35, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Wed, Jul
17 matches
Mail list logo
