Re: Lost interrupts during boot

2007-06-10 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 08 June 2007 17:52, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Friday 08 June 2007 11:43, Paolo Pisati wrote: > >>> I testing booting with a combo USB/Firewire carbus card, but no > >>> interrupts are > >>> genereated. If I plug the card in when the computer is not cold, it

Re: pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:15:33PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > ---> Checking the package registry database > > > Stale dependency: Xaw3d-1.5E_1 -> xf86dgaproto-2.0.2 (x11/xf86dgaproto): > > > Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]

Re: pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > ---> Checking the package registry database > > Stale dependency: Xaw3d-1.5E_1 -> xf86dgaproto-2.0.2 (x11/xf86dgaproto): > > Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes] n >

Re: GPT - (last) call for action

2007-06-10 Thread Rui Paulo
At Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:43:26 -0700 (PDT), Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > :No. > :The first partition is the EFI GPT (0xee): > : > :% fdisk -1 > :*** Working on device /dev/ad0 *** > :... > :parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > :cylinders=116280 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 b

Re: GPT - (last) call for action

2007-06-10 Thread Rui Paulo
At Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:08:47 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Jun 10, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > :Technically speaking, the MBR can only have a single partition of > > :type 0xEE that covers the whole disk. This is to protect the GPT > > :from MBR-specific tools that d

Re: pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:59:14PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole > > upgrade of my stable machine. I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list > > for this but it is so

Re: pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole > upgrade of my stable machine. I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list > for this but it is so amazing that I don't know what the right list > would be and I think

Re: pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:15:29PM -0700, Jeff Anton wrote: > I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole > upgrade of my stable machine. Well, it didn't. > I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list for this Correct. > but it is so amazing that I don't know what the rig

pkgdb -F calling portupgrade -a

2007-06-10 Thread Jeff Anton
I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole upgrade of my stable machine. I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list for this but it is so amazing that I don't know what the right list would be and I think just calling attention to some very bizarre behavior is maybe the b

Re: GPT - (last) call for action

2007-06-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:No. :The first partition is the EFI GPT (0xee): : :% fdisk -1 :*** Working on device /dev/ad0 *** :... :parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: :cylinders=116280 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) : :Media sector size is 512 :Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sect

Re: Disable mutex spinning?

2007-06-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Ivan Voras wrote: > I'm thinking of experiment - removing all spinning from mutex-like code > and try running such kernel in a VMWare machine. For start, is there > anything else except turning off ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES, ADAPTIVE_GIANT and > ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS I can do via the kernel config file? Hmm, o

Disable mutex spinning?

2007-06-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Hi I'm not sure I'm thinking the right way here, so this could be just nonsense. Since I started using VMWare (and that was a long time ago) and other virtual machine applications, I've noticed FreeBSD spends a lot of time in system space (i.e. much time is allocated to "sys" in utilities like to

Re: GPT - (last) call for action

2007-06-10 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Jun 10, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote: :Technically speaking, the MBR can only have a single partition of :type 0xEE that covers the whole disk. This is to protect the GPT :from MBR-specific tools that do not know about the GPT. This is :not a bootable slice by definition. : :Pract

Re: GPT - (last) call for action

2007-06-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Technically speaking, the MBR can only have a single partition of :type 0xEE that covers the whole disk. This is to protect the GPT :from MBR-specific tools that do not know about the GPT. This is :not a bootable slice by definition. : :Practice is different. To support bootcamp on Intel-based Mac

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Roman Divacky wrote: >> Now there's only the matter of importing it :) >> > > you mean... like was done 2 weeks ago? :) Aargh. (it was done a few minutes after I've last cvsupped and started buildworld, so I've just missed it). Thanks and sorry for bogosity. signature.asc Description: OpenPG

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Roman Divacky
> Now there's only the matter of importing it :) > you mean... like was done 2 weeks ago? :) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: kern/83807: [sis] [patch] if_sis: Wake On Lan support for FreeBSD

2007-06-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Edwin Mons wrote: > I currently have one -CURRENT machine, and several 6.2-STABLE machines. For > at least two of them (the -CURRENT and an x86 -STABLE machine) I'd really > like to have WoL support, as these are my workstation and a home server, >

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > 0n Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >I'm trying to use file(1) to detect file system type on partitions, and > >so far it's working for any file system I've cared to try (the usual MS > >and Linux list) *except* UFS2. > > Not s

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >I'm trying to use file(1) to detect file system type on partitions, and >so far it's working for any file system I've cared to try (the usual MS >and Linux list) *except* UFS2. Not sure if what you're doing *has* to be

Ricoh r5u870

2007-06-10 Thread Maslan
Hi, Is there is any one working on Ricoh r5u870 webcam driver ? Ricoh r5u870 known as hp webcam. Thanks -- System Programmer I'm Searching For Perfection, So Even If U Need Potability U've To Use Assembly ;-) -- http://libosdk.berlios.de/wiki/ ___ fre

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Roman Divacky wrote: > well... yeah but not to freebsd :) I guess you want to forward the patch > upstream > to the maintainers of file. Thanks. By a happy coincedence, it's already there, in version 4.21! 42332 belong 0x19540119 Unix Fast File system [v2] (big-endian) >&-

Re: file(1) cannot detect UFS2?

2007-06-10 Thread Roman Divacky
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to use file(1) to detect file system type on partitions, and > so far it's working for any file system I've cared to try (the usual MS > and Linux list) *except* UFS2. > > Detecting UFS1 works, though much more verbo

IPv6 ANSI cleanup

2007-06-10 Thread Karl Sjödahl - dunceor
Hello. I made diffs to ANSI the IPv6 stack in both OpenBSD and NetBSD and here comes my version for FreeBSD. NetBSD has already commited their diff and it would be good if all the *BSD have the same style for it. Diff can be found here: http://213.113.152.10/freebsd_ipv6.diff br dunceor ___