Re: RFI: Ethernet driver ported from Linux

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:34:16PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Alan Garfield wrote: > >On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:56 +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > >> > >>>Apart from using fake MAC addresses, I don't think so. > >>I don't understand the concept of a fake MAC address, sorry. > >>The classic Ethernet

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

Andy Hilker wrote: Hi, You (Jan Knepper) wrote: Any change this can be included officially at some point? Yes, this would be really nice. Especially because it would not be conflicting with using freebsd-update (without an own build server). Probably should be a configuration opti

Re: Ipv6 mbuf vulnerability

Subhash Gopinath wrote: > Does anyone know if FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x is affected by the Ipv6 mbuf > vulnerability just like OpenBSD? > > http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentMod&action=item&id=1703 The project ipv6 experts have convinced me that FreeBSD is not affected. Colin Perciva

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

Hi, You (Jan Knepper) wrote: > Any change this can be included officially at some point? Yes, this would be really nice. Especially because it would not be conflicting with using freebsd-update (without an own build server). bye, Andy ___ freebsd-hack

Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2

Mohacsi Janos wrote: Hi Jan, The problem with your patch is the missing IPv6 support. I know... So what you are saying it does not work? The drafonfly version already supports it. I know... However... If you could get me a version of DragonFlyBSD that supports amd64 I might consider switch