Hello,
(sorry, don't know whether kernel problems should go to questions or
hackers, or both)..
This has been a long-standing problem of mine, but I always ignored
it hoping it would go away on its own with a future 6.x release, but
it remains...
No matter whether I boot into safe mode
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it
was proclaimed:
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
> >
> > > What does the per
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
>
> > What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
> > 4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP sc
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:05:53AM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
> >
> >>What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT
> >>tree with
> >>4BSD or ULE
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
> proclaimed:
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
> >
> > > What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tr
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
> What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
> 4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for
> scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what
> the p
On 2/24/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have re
I wonder why these fraudulent scam artists/spammers abusing our freebsd
lists.
They are in wrong place with wrong people.
I am not buying your idea anyway. dude, you chose a wrong person.
Thanks
Dak
-- Forwarded message --
From: wale qazim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 24,
On Saturday 24 February 2007 1:31 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
> year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling
> FreeBSD in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for
> performance bottlenecks to be optimized.
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for MySQL
On 2/23/07, Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/22/07, DAK GHATIKACHALAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/18/07, DAK GHATIKACHALAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Freebsd
> > >
> > >
> > > I have an issue with new car
hello
i have a first revision macbook pro (core duo 2ghz, not core 2 duo!)
i have sort of a problem here
freebsd 6.2 and 7.0 current (5 feb.) don't really boot correctly
i get:
AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed!
panic y/n? [y]
sometimes i get around this problem if i press the power button in
the exact rig
hello
i have a first revision macbook pro (core duo 2ghz, not core 2 duo!)
i have sort of a problem here
freebsd 6.2 and 7.0 current (5 feb.) don't really boot correctly
i get:
AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed!
panic y/n? [y]
sometimes i get around this problem if i press the power button in
the exact rig
Quoting Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:03:42
+0100):
> Was __FreeBSD_version bumped when this change was introduced?
Yes (700031). Not in the same commit, but shortly after it.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
BOFH excuse #151:
Some one needed the powerstrip, so they pulled t
Hi,
On 2/23/07, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm creating a standard FreeBSD 6.2 ISO image that I can use to
perform unattended installations into VMware Server virtual machines.
I'm using VMServer 1.0.1, and I've hit a roadblock when sysinstall
attempts to create the roo
Hi,
Was __FreeBSD_version bumped when this change was introduced?
--HPS
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
16 matches
Mail list logo