Howdy list,
A tutorial introduction to the ELF(3)/GELF(3) API set is
available for review at the following URL:
"libelf by Example"
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy/download/libelf/article.html
The intent is to add this tutorial to our documentation
collection.
Features:
- Covers the basics
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Peter Holmes wrote:
This is something I am interested in doing as well. I had corresponded with
Julian Eischen & Daniel Elischer about this.
Dan Eischen and Julian Elischer :-)
Yes, it needed byte reversal or something. That would indeed be
a st
Peter Holmes wrote:
This is something I am interested in doing as well. I had corresponded with
Julian Eischen & Daniel Elischer about this.
Dan Eischen and Julian Elischer :-)
This was suggested by them but I haven't been able to figure it
all out. Basically we could create SYSTEM_SCO
This is something I am interested in doing as well. I had corresponded with
Julian Eischen & Daniel Elischer about this.
This was suggested by them but I haven't been able to figure it
all out. Basically we could create SYSTEM_SCOPE pthreads. This way
there is one KSE per pthread. I was
--- Victor Loureiro Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] du -s /etc
> 2544/etc
>
> What gives that when "/usr/bin/du -s" is running from crontab is gives
> the exact double of entries in the directory but when it is running
> from console itself, it doesnt display the same amoun
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
it were written in a l
2007/2/9, R. B. Riddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Victor Loureiro Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] du -s /etc
> 2544/etc
>
> What gives that when "/usr/bin/du -s" is running from crontab is gives
> the exact double of entries in the directory but when it is running
> from co
youshi10 wrote :
> > Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
> > the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
> > it were written in a language in the base system.
> >
> > > --
> > Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://www.mired.org/cons
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Victor Loureiro Lima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Hello -hackers and -fs,
>
> Sorry for the cross-post but I didnt know where this particular post
> belonged to...
> In a .br FreeBSD related mailing-list a user seems to have a found a
> bug when using /usr/bin/du and cron
Hello -hackers and -fs,
Sorry for the cross-post but I didnt know where this particular post
belonged to...
In a .br FreeBSD related mailing-list a user seems to have a found a
bug when using /usr/bin/du and crontab together, I am posting it here
to see what responses we get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] d
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote:
>
> The modem is PCI, and there is no facility in the BIOS to display what
> cards are in the system. Furthermore, the irq mapping shows irq 3-15,
> irq 17, 18, and 19 do not show on the list. Below is the full dmesg
> from the boot:
On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
>>Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into
>>the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if
>>it were written in a language in the base system.
>
>Would pe
On 2007-Feb-09 10:27:07 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This very much does involve core because I plan on handing the modem,
>and the entire computer if necessary, over to a core developer so they
>can figure out why it doesn't work and correct the problem, if they can.
This is a v
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
>
> > I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> > this has anything to do with core.
> >
>
> This very much does involve core because I
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote..
> At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
>
> > I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> > this has anything to do with core.
> >
>
> This very much does involve core because I
At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> this has anything to do with core.
>
This very much does involve core because I plan on handing the modem,
and the entire computer if necessary, over to a
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel TALON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
Funny that i have just announced a program, that i have called pkgupgrade
(by analogy with portupgrade, i was not aware of his other work), and whose
aim is precisely to do the things you want
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it the calls I made with ps in the program
are valid for Linux but not for FreeBSD (they're for getting thread
listings). Hence error code 2.
From intro(2):
2 ENOENT No
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel TALON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Funny that i have just announced a program, that i have called pkgupgrade
> (by analogy with portupgrade, i was not aware of his other work), and whose
> aim is precisely to do the things you want - i don't pretend it succeeds
> perf
Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> Been there, done that, cried. I've also tried portmanager and portmaster
> (which I'm using now with portsconf for source-based systems). My wish
> is pkg_update, which can be used to upgrade pkg_add'ed packages.
Funny that i have just announced a program, that i hav
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:05:22PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
> I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
> this has anything to do with core.
Indeed, this does not have anything to do with core.
Wilko
>
> On 2007-Feb-09 00:16:31 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
this has anything to do with core.
On 2007-Feb-09 00:16:31 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
>sio0: port may not be enabled
>sio0: port
>0xdc00-0xdcff,0xe000-0xe0ff,0
At about the time of 2/9/2007 12:16 AM, Daniel Rudy stated the following:
> I'm having a problem with a Zoom PCI Fax Modem Model 2920A. The modem
> has the latest firmware version, but there seems to be a problem with
> the sio driver. Note that this *IS* a controller based modem.
>
Almost forg
I'm having a problem with a Zoom PCI Fax Modem Model 2920A. The modem
has the latest firmware version, but there seems to be a problem with
the sio driver. Note that this *IS* a controller based modem.
Here's the relevant information from dmesg:
sio0: configured irq 19 not in bitmap of probed
24 matches
Mail list logo
