Re: The nature of kernel of the FreeBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > A doubt, > > Kernel of the FreeBSD is monolithic, correct !!! Correct. > The MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeBSD, correct !!! Not correct. The MacOS kernel is derived from Mach, not FreeBSD. The MacOS userland is mostly derived

Re: The nature of kernel of the FreeBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:20:39PM -0300, Eder wrote: > A doubt, > > Kernel of the FreeBSD is monolithic, correct !!! Correct. > > The MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeBSD, correct !!! Incorrect. The kernel of MacOS X is mainly derived from the Mach kernel, not from FreeBSD. I believe

Re: The nature of kernel of the FreeBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Julian Elischer
Eder wrote: A doubt, Kernel of the FreeBSD is monolithic, correct !!! The MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeBSD, correct !!! no, wrong. The MacOS kernel is "related distantly" to the FreeBSD kernel. It has been derived from MACH 3 and MACH 2.5 which themselves had SOME components de

Re: The nature of kernel of the FreeBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:20:39PM -0300, Eder wrote: > > Kernel of the FreeBSD is monolithic, correct !!! Yes. > > The MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeBSD, correct !!! > No. Your email should have gone to freebsd-questions instead of this list. -- Steve __

The nature of kernel of the FreeBSD

2006-09-06 Thread Eder
A doubt, Kernel of the FreeBSD is monolithic, correct !!! The MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeBSD, correct !!! It would like to understand because the performance of a MacOS as serving it is very inferior of what a FreeBSD server, being that the MacOS is derived from kernel of the FreeB

Re: ldconfig "skipping" libraries (6.1-R)

2006-09-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:18:18PM +, Edward B. DREGER wrote: > Greetings all, > > > I'd been going nuts trying to determine why I couldn't link against > "libdb-4.4.so" and a few other libraries. The ones in question didn't > show up via > > ldconfig -r > > although their respecti

ldconfig "skipping" libraries (6.1-R)

2006-09-06 Thread Edward B. DREGER
Greetings all, I'd been going nuts trying to determine why I couldn't link against "libdb-4.4.so" and a few other libraries. The ones in question didn't show up via ldconfig -r although their respective directories _were_ found. (Yes, I even ran "ldconfig -R" for good measure.)

Re: PRO/wireless scanning

2006-09-06 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 13:32, Johnny Choque wrote: > I'm testing the scanning features of Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG build-in > Toshiba Tecra M3 using FreeBSD 6.1 and iwi-firmware-2.4_7 (I think that > it is the last version, isn't it?). I have noticed a unstable behavior > of the wireless i

PRO/wireless scanning

2006-09-06 Thread Johnny Choque
Hi all, I'm testing the scanning features of Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG build-in Toshiba Tecra M3 using FreeBSD 6.1 and iwi-firmware-2.4_7 (I think that it is the last version, isn't it?). I have noticed a unstable behavior of the wireless interface when I try to scan the access point around it (if

powerd. Info request

2006-09-06 Thread Cristiano Deana
Hi, i got a strange behaviour with powerd: # powerd -v idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 2000 MHz to 1750 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1750 MHz to 1500 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1500 MHz to 1250 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed fro