Re: RadioShack USB/Serial converter on FreeBSD 6.0-stable?

2006-08-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jaye Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Running 6.0-stable as of 8/17. Bought a USB/Serial converter for my : notebook from radio shack. Works under windows, but comes : on as a "ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller. rev 1.10/3.00

Re: RadioShack USB/Serial converter on FreeBSD 6.0-stable?

2006-08-19 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > Running 6.0-stable as of 8/17. Bought a USB/Serial converter for my > notebook from radio shack. Works under windows, but comes > on as a "ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller. rev > 1.10/3.00, addr". > > I

RadioShack USB/Serial converter on FreeBSD 6.0-stable?

2006-08-19 Thread Jaye Mathisen
Running 6.0-stable as of 8/17. Bought a USB/Serial converter for my notebook from radio shack. Works under windows, but comes on as a "ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller. rev 1.10/3.00, addr". Is there a simple way for me to make this recognizable as a serial interface (pr

Re: struct dirent question

2006-08-19 Thread Micah
M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : #define MAXNAMLEN 255 : chard_name[MAXNAMLEN + 1]; /* name must be no longer than : this */ : #if !__BSD_VISIBLE : #undef MAXNAMLEN : #endif : }; : I'm not sure if it's more reada

ASIX Ax88772 anybody?

2006-08-19 Thread Volker
Hi hackers, is anybody working on an Asix Ax88772 implementation? As far as I've seen at some oBsd hacks this chip is close (but not exactly identical) to the already supported Ax88172 axe(4) chip but a few hacks are needed. I'm wondering if somebody already has this on his/her todo list? If not

Re: struct dirent question

2006-08-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : #define MAXNAMLEN 255 : chard_name[MAXNAMLEN + 1]; /* name must be no longer than : this */ : #if !__BSD_VISIBLE : #undef MAXNAMLEN : #endif : }; : I'm not sure if it's more readable, but it puts 255 in o

Re: Path transformation

2006-08-19 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > For example, this path corresponds to the current working directory: > > "dir1/dir2/dir3/../../../" > > So I'd like to be able to pass that to a function and get the optimised > result of: > > "." > > It's giving me a real hea

Re: Path transformation

2006-08-19 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:27:49 +0100 "mal content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > Hello. > > Is there any code in the tree that does general path transformation > or 'optimisation'? > realpath(3) -- Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Россия, Москва htt

Re: Path transformation

2006-08-19 Thread mal content
On 19/08/06, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:27:49PM +0100, mal content wrote: > Is there any code in the tree that does general path transformation > or 'optimisation'? > > For example, this path corresponds to the current working directory: > > "dir1/di

Re: Path transformation

2006-08-19 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:27:49PM +0100, mal content wrote: > Is there any code in the tree that does general path transformation > or 'optimisation'? > > For example, this path corresponds to the current working directory: > > "dir1/dir2/dir3/../../../" It might or might not. E.g. dir2 could

Path transformation

2006-08-19 Thread mal content
Hello. Is there any code in the tree that does general path transformation or 'optimisation'? For example, this path corresponds to the current working directory: "dir1/dir2/dir3/../../../" So I'd like to be able to pass that to a function and get the optimised result of: "." And so on for