:
:* Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
:
:> felt that 8 partitions is restrictive. My main home server has 10
:> and the main DragonFly box has 11.
:>
:> There is another solution for FreeBSD folks, however. You *DO* have
:> four slices to play with. You can put a dis
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:16:53PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> I guess I just expected it to print all character device entries for the
> file descriptors open by my process.
It did-- well it printed all the file descriptors open by your process,
which in this case was "ls". 0, 1, and 2 are std
In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:18:48PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said:
> > > s2# mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd
> > > s2# ls -l /dev/fd
> > > total 16
> > > crw--w 1 root tty 5, 1 Ju
Eric Anderson wrote:
So, you can mimic an entire tree with something like:
cp -al /from/ /to/
pax -rwl -pe /from /to
is almost what you want. (It requires
that /to exist first, though.)
If you want to match the 'cp' semantics when /to does
not exist, you can use pax's rewrite option:
pax
Looking at siginfo it isn't clear that there is a "right way" to
provide SIGSEGV, eva, and the error code.
_fault._trapno should contain the machine's error code and si_signo
should contain SIGSEGV, and si_addr contains the faulting pc. Maybe
one could abuse si_code to contain eva. Sorry for ask
I'm refering to the following two lines in sys/i386/i386/trap.c
/* kludge to pass faulting virtual address to sendsig */
frame->tf_err = eva;
Isn't there some other way to do this? Wouldn't the address still be
available in %cr2 inside sendsig? Or could there have been other page
faults by then
* Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> felt that 8 partitions is restrictive. My main home server has 10
> and the main DragonFly box has 11.
>
> There is another solution for FreeBSD folks, however. You *DO* have
> four slices to play with. You can put a disklabel wit
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:36:27PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:21:59PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> :> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:39:37AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> :
> :Hmm, for the sake of compatibility, wouldn't it have been an option,
> :to add this extra
8 matches
Mail list logo
