In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi hackers,
:
: I'm trying to correctly implement a driver for an USB device which
: has multiple (serial) interfaces (at least 3). Each interface should
: be seen by the kernel as a tty device entry /dev(/cuaU* or /d
Hello Bob,
Hello @Lists,
countobjects()
{
myline=0
cat $objectcountfile|grep -v "^[^0-9]*$"|grep -v "^0$"|
awk '{myline += $1} END {print myline}' > $objectsum
}
this gave me the right behavior.
THX
i ve forgotten that the piping opens another subshell,
so it is clearly logical that the 2
--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On 2006-06-01 03:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > FWIW, I'd also like to see libumem ported.
>
> Me too.
>
> I have been toying with the idea of consulting Jason Evans about
> this for a while now. If something like this starts, are you
>
Hello,
i have a little problem with the
scope of sheel variables in an script.
the script shows like:
#!/bin/sh
objectcountfile=/data2/scout/objects
objectsum=/data2/scout/objcount
sometime=5
initialize()
{
[ ! -e $objectsum ] && touch $objectsum
}
#
countobjects()
{
myline=0
cat $objectcount
On Jun 1, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
Agreed it would be. I'd love to see it (I'm an advocate for as
many filesystems available as possible actually).
So, the real question is, who's going to volunteer to start
actually porting it?
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
Agreed it would be. I'd love to see it (I'm an advocate for as many
filesystems available as possible actually).
So, the real question is, who's going to volunteer to start actually porting
it?
People interested in volunteering can expect lots of h
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
Hi,
on a fairly new 6.1-stable, and probably before, once in a
blue moon, sendto return error 64 (EHOSTDOWN?). but the packet seems to have
been received by the target, since i get a response, and further more,
everything keeps on working.
wha
but this doesnt function right. so i see the behavior from
$myline in the while-loop like an local variable..
If you are looking for function local variables,
use the "local" keyword. For example:
a.sh
a=1
f()
{
local a
a=2
echo B: In f: $a
}
echo A: Outside
Sir :
question one :
I see lots' of use of pcib_get_bus but i cannot see the
defination ,where is it ?
question two:
what is the relationship among 1device_delete_child
2devclass_delete_device and 3devclass_delete_driver
there seems some overlap among them :)
1devclass_delete_driver ->de
On 2006-06-01 03:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FWIW, I'd also like to see libumem ported.
Me too.
I have been toying with the idea of consulting Jason Evans about
this for a while now. If something like this starts, are you
willing to help with the port?
___
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
There was recent discovery of the problem in the vixie cron job execution,
see http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18108/ and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178431 The hole exists
because calls to the setuid(2) goes unchecked for e
On Wed, 31 May 2006, André Braga wrote:
A post scriptum to the original message:
The buggy behaviour won't affect the host system, but the jail could well be
compromised. I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't respected inside
jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below
By
There was recent discovery of the problem in the vixie cron
job execution, see
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18108/
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178431
The hole exists because calls to the setuid(2) goes unchecked
for errors.
At first look, the issue seems to be irre
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> I realize how hard getting write support for one of those is, for
> certain.You'd still have to go through the labor with ZFS though,
> unless you are talk
2006/6/1, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
AFAIR the DFly FPU rework allows to use FPU/XMM instructions in their
kernel without the need to do some manual state preserving (it's done
automatically on demand). So one could use XMM instructions in RAID 5
or crypto parts of the code to test
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> I realize how hard getting write support for one of those is, for
> certain.You'd still have to go through the labor with ZFS though,
> unless you are talking about read-only suppo
André Braga wrote:
A post scriptum to the original message:
The buggy behaviour won't affect the host system, but the jail could
well be compromised. I also have this feeling that ACLs also aren't
respected inside jails or can be overwritten as easily as shown below
Thanks,
André
for all folks
Quoting Attilio Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 1 Jun 2006
01:32:12 +0200):
2006/6/1, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The new code wouldn't behave much differently under SMP. It just might
be a smaller optimization because more memory pressure for SMP causes
more cache misses for every
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> I realize how hard getting write support for one of those is, for
> certain.You'd still have to go through the labor with ZFS though,
> unless you are talking about read-only support for it. I don't know
> much about licensing stuff.
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
...
>
>
> ZFS surely is cool, but I'm not sure how much it benefits FreeBSD
> compared to something like journaling, or adding features to our
> existing filesystem, or even write support for one of the already ported
> read-only filesystems
> Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > on a fairly new 6.1-stable, and probably before, once in a
> > blue moon, sendto return error 64 (EHOSTDOWN?). but the packet seems to have
> > been received by the target, since i get a response, and further more,
> > everything keeps on working.
> >
> >
Danny Braniss wrote:
Hi,
on a fairly new 6.1-stable, and probably before, once in a
blue moon, sendto return error 64 (EHOSTDOWN?). but the packet seems to have
been received by the target, since i get a response, and further more,
everything keeps on working.
what is error 64?
danny
Hi,
on a fairly new 6.1-stable, and probably before, once in a
blue moon, sendto return error 64 (EHOSTDOWN?). but the packet seems to have
been received by the target, since i get a response, and further more,
everything keeps on working.
what is error 64?
danny
___
Hi,
I’m trying to use ANA-6922 multi-port board on FreeBSD 6.1-BETA1.
Works only first port when using dc driver. This is because board
has only one ROM and second port must use shared ROM (kern/79262). I
wrote patch for this.
But there is another problem (with or without patch). Both ports
c
24 matches
Mail list logo
