(OK, I'm *waaay* behind on -hackers.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>We have an older server, running 5.4-RELEASE-p8 and used primarily
>for email, which hangs every couple of weeks. The hang seems to
>be in the disk I/O system. Based on the times of the hangs, the
>triggering event seems t
-
Apakah Anda Yahoo!?
Kunjungi halaman depan Yahoo! Indonesia yang baru!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Nate Lawson wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Agree 100%. While having it in usermode means there are boundary
crossings that increase per-transaction latency, the actual bulk
data transfer is via zero-copy IO and you should be able to exceed
the data transfe
Matt Hartzell wrote:
Would using the libpthread from 5 have any negative affect on MySQL
performance?
Not if MySQL is compiled on 6.x (libpthread was in libpthread.so.1 in
5.3+ but in libpthread.so.2 in 6.x).
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
I am running a stock FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE system, with
the built-in ssh/sshd.
I am interested in limiting the number of ssh
connections any particular user can make to the system
... for instance, if limited to 3, they could login
interactively, commence an rsync over ssh, and
commence an scp file
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:27:50AM -0600, Matt Hartzell wrote..
I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
fail over.
The util's on http://p
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:27:50AM -0600, Matt Hartzell wrote..
> I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
> GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
>
> I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
> fail over.
>
> The util's on http://people.freebsd
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:21:51AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:40:58PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > > Possible solutions/workarounds:
> > > 1. do still call -prune and some primaries without side eff
Sorry if this is a very basic question, but I'm trying to extend the
struct mount (sys/sys/mount.h) to contain a lot of statistics, and then
use a userland tool to read those statistics on a per mounted file
system basis. I can't seem to figure out exactly how to do this, and
even if this real
Brian J. McGovern wrote:
All,
I've done some hacking on bootparamd to support multiple subnets
(along with applying some patches to allow some Sun-specific behavior) that
I'm using for jumpstarting Solaris/Sparc boxes across a boatload of small
subnets.
The most obvious change
Ashley Moran wrote:
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be implemented
as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds like a bit of a hack
right now.
You can already d
I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
fail over.
The util's on http://people.freebsd.org/~jcagle/ don't seen to work
under 6.x, however status messages are sen
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:21:51AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:40:58PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > Possible solutions/workarounds:
> > 1. do still call -prune and some primaries without side effects
> >in pre-order even if -d is in effect, even though this does n
I have used the whole range (or somewhat) for internal SA's. Starting with
the internal one in DL380R1 and up to G4.
Performance of 6i in freebsd is better than 5i, but worse than if you
insert a external card (6402/6404). I mostly use the internal SA as
systemdisk only on systems with a lot of d
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:37:00AM +0200, Cole wrote:
> Yeah.
>
> That does help quite a lot. However, I did find something regarding this
> called own-tty, but that
> was for linux, and also written in like 1998.
> http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/sw/usershell.html
>
> I was actually hoping to
15 matches
Mail list logo
