Re: Why INVARIANTS option and sanity checking?

>The design for FreeBSD calls for all memory and other resources provided >to unprivileged processes to be scrubbed before being made available. >Only using privilege should a process be able to gain access to unscrubbed >resources through allocation. For example: > >- When a process allocates

Re: misc questions about the device&driver arch

On 11/6/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:14 am, kylin wrote: > > On 11/6/05, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >kylin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > : /// > > > : pci bridge

Re: misc questions about the device&driver arch

On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:14 am, kylin wrote: > On 11/6/05, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >kylin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > : /// > > : pci bridge dynamic resize > > : / > > : it seems that the device

Re: misc questions about the device&driver arch

On 11/6/05, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >kylin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : /// > : pci bridge dynamic resize > : / > : it seems that the device arch of freebsd is similar to what is revealed in > : window OS. i