Thanks, I think they figured it out. The customer is always
rightsigh
I used the list because I needed to know if there was a quick fix here,
I added them to a spamassassin whitelist.
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:00:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D
Nice work!
Is possible to implement a "port address forwarding" (aka PAT) using some
ipfw rules? (or with any other way)
Something similar to "-redirect_port" option of natd(8).
TIA,
Chris.
Paolo Pisati wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:41:16AM +, Nate Nielsen wrote:
No. I think ea
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:00:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:51:49 -0600
> From: Steve Suhre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: BGP & reverse dns
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:51:49AM -0600, Steve Suhre wrote:
> I don't want to turn off reverse lookups, is there anyway to get around
> this? Or a simple fix on their end? I know nothing about BGP routing...
> We're running sendmail, and spammassassin through procmail. The mail
> problem starte
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:41:16AM +, Nate Nielsen wrote:
> No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it)
> could only use one IP address as it's public address.
FYI you can use nat inside ipfw[*]:
ipfw nat 1 config ip 192.168.0.123
ipfw nat 2 config ip 192.168.0.456
.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:35:52PM +0100, eoghan wrote:
> On a different note... I tried the upgrade from the sysinstall
> and used the main ftp freebsd site...
I usually upgrade system via cvsup and recompile it new from source.
1st kernel, reboot, then OS.
Mandatory is to read /usr/src/UPDATIN
Nate Nielsen (nielsen-list) writes:
> No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it)
> could only use one IP address as it's public address.
One could use probability rules to divert to different natds with
different NAT addresses, and use choparp / aliases t
Andreas Klemm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:37:25AM +0100, eoghan wrote:
>
>>[... rc.conf ...]
>>Also, my network assign ip's to each pc on the network.
>>I noticed in the conf the ip was specified, which can
>>change... is there any way of doing this in the rc.conf?
>
>
> So you have a DHCP
No. I think each instance of natd (at least last time I looked at it)
could only use one IP address as it's public address.
Cheers,
Nate
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
> Exists the possibility to make NAT POOL with IPFW + NATD ?
>
___
freebsd-hackers@fr
9 matches
Mail list logo
