Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There were always two things I would recommend waiting for before moving
> to 5.x:
> 1. Performance. I remember reading the after 5.0's release, much
>debugging code was still in the OS and kernel which would reduce
>performance.
This debugging code
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:35:20PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > We've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 server that's been up for 460
> > days now, with pretty heavy use the whole time (70GB+ per day http
> > traffic, 140 hits/sec, etc).
>
> Funny that some people insist on complaining about 5.
Hi,
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2005-06-18 at 10:30:58 Kevin Day wrote:
We've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 server that's been up for 460
days now, with pretty heavy use the whole time (70GB+ per day http
traffic, 140 hits/sec, etc).
Funny that some people insist on complaining about 5.x i
On 2005-06-18 at 10:30:58 Kevin Day wrote:
> We've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 server that's been up for 460
> days now, with pretty heavy use the whole time (70GB+ per day http
> traffic, 140 hits/sec, etc).
Funny that some people insist on complaining about 5.x instability. :P
pgpGnWaJZ7
We've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 server that's been up for 460
days now, with pretty heavy use the whole time (70GB+ per day http
traffic, 140 hits/sec, etc).
Before we give it a reboot to upgrade, does anyone want to see any
counters or stats or anything? I ask because it's sometimes
5 matches
Mail list logo
