Re: HEADS UP! 6.0 Schedule, 6.0-CURRENT Snapshot

2005-06-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:33AM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:14:26PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > > All, > > > > The long anticipated and much feared 6.0 code freeze is about to begin! > > I'll cut to the chase: > > > > June 10 - Feature freeze + code slush

Re: NDIS driver Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG reaches kernel panic

2005-06-11 Thread Braulio José Solano Rojas
I have tried using the w29n50.sys file instead of w29n51.sys. It seems that the NDIS wrapper has some trouble with NDIS 5.1 drivers. However it works sometimes. When I kldload the driver I get this: no match for MmMapIoSpace no match for MmUnmapIoSpace no match for InterlockedExchange ndis0: me

Re: NDIS driver Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG reaches kernel panic

2005-06-11 Thread Shawn Nock
Coincidently, I tried to revert to the ndis wrapper for my 2200bg after several months using if_iwi... (iwi has some problems: won't associate with hidden ssid host & the g speed negociation leaves something to be desired) I am experiencing the same panic on a very recent current: FreeBSD rainbow

Re: NDIS driver Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG reaches kernel panic

2005-06-11 Thread Florent Thoumie
Le Vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 18:48 -0600, Braulio José Solano Rojas a écrit : > Hello. > > I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a ASUS S5200N. Runs very nice! > > However I still need to install Wifi. I saw that Intel(R) PRO/Wireless > 2200BG is not supported by wlan FreeBSD driver (reading through th

mio_connect specificity

2005-06-11 Thread Oleg Gritsak
Greetings! Would you, please, help to understand, what's specific FreeBSD has in a syscall mio_connect? The problem, I've ran into is - the shutting jabber server. In linux this code: out->fd = mio_connect(s2s->mio, pkt->port, pkt->ip, _out_mio_callback, (void *) out); doesn't lead to problem

Re: unitialized memory is all zeros...why not garbage instead?

2005-06-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a feeling that I'm missing something really obvious, but I'm having > trouble understanding why the following program: > [...] > Never prints anything but "0"'s. Because the kernel always hands processes pre-zeroed pages. > I ran less up to my hw.p