Hi,
Hervé Kergourlay wrote:
xorgconfig
I launch this tools but I 'm not sure of the screen resolution details,
vertical refresh rate, horizontal sync rate, ...
I fill the answers with standard values
Do not do this. You must have the details for you monitor. Especially if
it is a CRT, it co
Hi Robert and all,
I'm really sorry for my cross posting, I posted my problem a year ago and
I'm still having trouble with tftp server.
I switched to Windows tftp server like 3Com 3C daemon for a while and now I
want to use tftp server on FreeBSD.
I'm using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and I tested def
Hi Robert and all,
I'm really sorry for my cross posting, I posted my problem a year ago and
I'm still having trouble with tftp server.
I switched to Windows tftp server like 3Com 3C daemon for a while and now I
want to use tftp server on FreeBSD.
I'm using FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE and I tested def
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:16AM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
>
> 5.4-STABLE from 5/27, repeated panics. Finally got a crashdump, fired up
> kgdb and:
> (is there any advantage to booting the kernel.debug instead of the regular
> kernel? Can't think
> of one, but possibley...).
Unfortunat
On 2005-05-29 15:39, "Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:23:51PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
>>> > What "obvious" reasons?
>>>
>>> I meant, when I have a dump image of the entire disk I cannot
>>>
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:23:51PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> > > What "obvious" reasons?
> >
> > I meant, when I have a dump image of the entire disk I cannot
> > run fsck on the entire dump. I had to know about the partitions
> > and
5.4-STABLE from 5/27, repeated panics. Finally got a crashdump, fired up kgdb
and:
(is there any advantage to booting the kernel.debug instead of the regular
kernel? Can't think
of one, but possibley...).
The box does run several jails. It has been crashing regularly under both
5.3-RELEASE
You might want to take a look at the bpf pseudo device and how it
handles polls int bpf.c. You need to use the selrecord() and
selwakeup() functions.
Check out:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/
On May 26, 2005, at 6:00 PM, Aziz Kezzou wrote:
Aziz Kezzou wrote:
Hi all
On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> > What "obvious" reasons?
>
> I meant, when I have a dump image of the entire disk I cannot
> run fsck on the entire dump. I had to know about the partitions
> and the slices and extract these from the disk dump.
You can't specify /dev/md0s
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:46:17PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:16, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> > I can create a vnode (mdconfig) of that disk but trying to fsck on it
> > fails for obvious reasons, since I had to access the slices and not the
> > whole disk dump.
>
>
On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:16, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> I can create a vnode (mdconfig) of that disk but trying to fsck on it
> fails for obvious reasons, since I had to access the slices and not the
> whole disk dump.
What "obvious" reasons?
Why fsck it at all? I would just mount it read only a
I have a disk dump of a failed drive from some time ago which I
want to recover. It is a complete dump with partitions and filesystems
and I'm in seek again for a tool to allow me to recover the
information from that disk.
I was hoping to get a working ffsrecov now under -current but probably tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
