which Wifi cards can be used for a WAP?

2005-04-01 Thread Brian Reichert
I'm looking at the impressive list of wireless network cards supported by FreeBSD here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html#WLAN But, I have the specific interest of building an 802.11g WAP. I seem to recall lore that not all Wifi cards could be used this way (something abo

Re: enable acpi

2005-04-01 Thread Dinesh Nair
On 03/31/05 20:51 John Baldwin said the following: The problem is that the taskqueue_swi in 4.x doesn't have a thread context that can be slept on via tsleep(). The fix would be to create a kthread in which to run the ACPI tasks. 4.x already has one such kthread for the taskqueue_thread taskqu

Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3

2005-04-01 Thread William Michael Grim
I'm not sure if it's before or after your changes, Poul-Henning. If there is a newer -RELEASE I can upgrade too, I will do that. I don't really want to upgrade to -STABLE, but I will also do that to relieve the issue if necessary. Just give me a recommendation on to either update RELEASE beyond -

Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3

2005-04-01 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > > >> I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and > >> open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a > >> tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, b

Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3

2005-04-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: >> I think we have a race in -STABLE relating to tty wakeups and >> open/close/device teardown. I've seen a panic relating to sio during a >> tty close on RELENG_5 about 5-6 months ago, but was unable to get a dump. >> Scott has since fixed dum

Re: 4BSD Scheduler Problem on 5.3

2005-04-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:03 pm, Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2005 03:38 pm, William Michael Grim wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I keep having kernel panics every couple weeks on my system. It occurs > > > in the sched_switch() functi

Re: Fwd: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken

2005-04-01 Thread Matthew Dillon
Here is the core of the FPU setup and restoration code for the kernel bcopy in DragonFly, from i386/bcopy.s. DragonFly uses the TD_SAVEFPU-is-a-pointer method that was outlined in the original comment in the FreeBSD code. I further enhance the algorithm to guarentee that the F

Re: Fwd: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken

2005-04-01 Thread Matthew Dillon
:>The use of the XMM registers is a cpu optimization. Modern CPUs, :>especially AMD Athlon and Opterons, are more efficient with 128 bit :>moves then with 64 bit moves. I experimented with all sorts of :>configurations, including the use of special data caching instructions, :>

Re: organization

2005-04-01 Thread Roman Kurakin
mohamed aslan wrote: hi guys it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel mailing list member for 3 years. I am driver developer, and I work with both Linux and FreeBSD. It is usual for me to changed OS I am working with a several times a day. What can I say, both source tr

Re: Fwd: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken

2005-04-01 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Matthew Dillon wrote: I didn't mean to get into the kernel's use of the FPU, but... All I really did was implement a comment that DG had made many years ago in the PCB structure about making the FPU save area a pointer rather then hardwiring it into the PCB. ISTR writi

Re: Making gcc "-Wformat" more verbose

2005-04-01 Thread Marc Olzheim
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:12:08PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Please have a look at it and tell me whether this could be useful for > FreeBSD or whether that's a bridge too far... > > The patch is at > http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/FreeBSD/gcc-printf.patch.txt > > Besides that, you'll need to in

Re: subtracting days from localtime problem

2005-04-01 Thread ALeine
I attached an example which shows the DST related changes this year. I just couldn't resist writing something where I get to use rare values such as 1112345678 and 1131131131 in a meaningful way. :-) ALeine ___ WebMail FREE http://m

Re: subtracting days from localtime problem

2005-04-01 Thread ALeine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One more question, what will happen next time when > time goes back in October? > Does following line correct it as same as now? > > /* make mktime(3) figure out whether DST is in effect */ > t->tm_isdst = -1; Yes, it will work correctly. You can see what happens by s