On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:47, Amandeep Pannu wrote:
> Now the em0 nic is up with 205.229.165.4 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig em1 inet 205.229.165.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
You can't have 2 NIC's on the same subnet (you can't have 2 IPs on any NIC in
the same subnet).
Why do you want to do this?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
> These bugs were found using the Coverity Prevent static analysis tool.
[...]
Thanks for reporting these! It's great that your tools have been
finding all these obscure bugs before users do. All of these
should be fixed now, except for the if_ti bug, whi
> ifconfig em1 inet 205.229.165.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
ifconfig em1 alias ALIAS-ADDRESSS netmask NETMASK
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
> Here are the headers needed in case someone reads this thread:
>
> #include /*needed only for NULL, can be removed*/
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
According to the manual page for psignal(9) in -current, you
only need and .
You need to hold the PROC lock for th
On Thursday, 17 March 2005 at 19:33:50 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
>
> int i;main(){for(;i["] o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
There used to be a whole culture of this sort of thing. My favourite
one is an anagram
On Thursday 17 March 2005 20:55, Aziz KEZZOU wrote:
> Here are the headers needed in case someone reads this thread:
>
> #include /*needed only for NULL, can be removed*/
> #include
> #include
As a community service: Style(9) instructs to include either OR
but not both. The latter includes
Hi Guys,
Anything on this.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
A
> Hi
>
> I have a machine running FreeBSD 5.0 , it is actually my Primary DNS
> server.
> it has two Nics.
> em0 and em1
> Now the em0 nic is up with 205.229.165.4 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> When I try to do
> ifconfig em1 inet 205.229.1
On 2005-03-18 00:50, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas:
>>On 2005-03-17 19:33, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
>>>
>>>int i;main(){for(;i["]>>o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
>>
>>I've wr
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 i386 machine I installed today, then ran cvsup
with tag=RELENG_5_3.
then I rebuilt my kernel with these options in:
# FireWire support
device firewire
device sbp
device fwe
device fwip
options DEVICE_POLLING
I plugged this machine
Giorgos Keramidas:
On 2005-03-17 19:33, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
int i;main(){for(;i["]
o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
I've written stuff that's probably a bit harder to read, but in Perl :P
% ca
Doug Barton wrote:
> This issue has been around a long time, but I keep forgetting to post
> it. When I enable NO_TCSH in /etc/make.conf, after a build/installworld
> I get this in /usr/src:
>
> ? bin/csh/gethost
> ? bin/csh/sh.err.h
> ? bin/csh/tc.const.h
>
> They don't seem to hurt anything, bu
Aziz KEZZOU wrote this message on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 14:55 -0500:
> > Aziz KEZZOU wrote this message on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:34 -0500:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I would like to send a signal (e.g SIGUSR1) to a user process from
> > > inside the kernel (kld module).
> > > Can any one tell me how to d
This issue has been around a long time, but I keep forgetting to post it.
When I enable NO_TCSH in /etc/make.conf, after a build/installworld I get
this in /usr/src:
? bin/csh/gethost
? bin/csh/sh.err.h
? bin/csh/tc.const.h
They don't seem to hurt anything, but it would be nice to get this fixed
On 2005-03-17 19:33, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
>
> int i;main(){for(;i["] o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
I've written stuff that's probably a bit harder to read, but in Perl :P
% cat filter.pl
#/u
Hi
I have a machine running FreeBSD 5.0 , it is actually my Primary DNS server.
it has two Nics.
em0 and em1
Now the em0 nic is up with 205.229.165.4 netmask 255.255.255.0
When I try to do
ifconfig em1 inet 205.229.165.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
it say File exists.
then i read that the netmask sh
> Aziz KEZZOU wrote this message on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:34 -0500:
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to send a signal (e.g SIGUSR1) to a user process from
> > inside the kernel (kld module).
> > Can any one tell me how to do it ?
> > I tried the following code inspired from sys/kern/kern_sig.c :
> >
Aziz KEZZOU wrote this message on Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:34 -0500:
> Hi all,
> I would like to send a signal (e.g SIGUSR1) to a user process from
> inside the kernel (kld module).
> Can any one tell me how to do it ?
> I tried the following code inspired from sys/kern/kern_sig.c :
> ==
Hi all,
I would like to send a signal (e.g SIGUSR1) to a user process from
inside the kernel (kld module).
Can any one tell me how to do it ?
I tried the following code inspired from sys/kern/kern_sig.c :
==
#include
#include
int proce
Hi,
I was unable to refrain from posting this :-)
int i;main(){for(;i["]
Best regards,
rik
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:38:49 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pietro Cerutti
> > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:05 AM
> > To: Lowell Gilbert
> > Cc: FreeBSD
> > Subject: Re:
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I posted this on freebsd-questions, but couldn't find a solution...
Maybe here
Thank you!
Please: don't Cc me, I'm on the list!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:04:45 +
Subject: Re: p
Hi Hackers,
I posted this on freebsd-questions, but couldn't find a solution...
Maybe here
Thank you!
Please: don't Cc me, I'm on the list!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:04:45 +
Subject: Re: problem due to ho
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
!
! --On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 11.43.31 +0100 Peter Much
! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
!
! >! So, you're saying that pctclsh *can* access, but pgaccess *cannot*?
! >Odd... ! I would expect they'd both use the same lib to connect,
23 matches
Mail list logo