Well, I'm screwed.
I set up the Linksys router so that the FreeBSD machine is the "DMZ"
host on the inside. Sending 6to4 to the router's outside address
results in tcpdump showing these on the inside:
22:09:36.138924 [linksys mac address] > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype
ARP (0x0806), length 60:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
I posted my proposed patch to current@ for review in the past. But,
no one responded. Could you test this? This is for 6-CURRENT at Feb 1.
If it doesn't apply cleanly, please let me know.
Domo arigato gozaimasu!
It had fuzz when applied to 5.3-RELEASE, but it did apply.
Hey, thanks a lot man, really appreciated :-)
Meanwhile the program has it's base already working, very nice since I
didn't touch C for quite some time now (I used to program when I was
younger, then shifted to system administration and shell scripting), but
I'm enjoying getting things done on my
Hi,
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:19:59 -0800
> Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nsayer> I've come up with the attached patch. It simply allows you to
optionally
nsayer> neuter the RFC-1918 checks. The problem is that there are some
instances
nsayer> where those checks would still be g
Turns out there is also a check in stf_output that I need to neuter for
this configuration. Attached is a revised patch.
--- net/if_stf.c.orig Thu Jul 15 01:26:06 2004
+++ net/if_stf.cFri Mar 11 15:05:52 2005
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#i
(I sent a version of this e-mail earlier today without the patch, but my
return address was not the same as the subscribed one, so I think it got
ate. Appologies if this is a dupe)
Historically, I've used FreeBSD machines as NAT routers.
Call me a traitor if you must, but it's getting harder to
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:56:29 -0600, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone working on this, or would someone like to work on it? I am not
> much of a code guru, but I have the resources to test this technology under
> all types of loads, and we are currently using a commercial soft
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:56:24PM +0100, Jos? Nicol?s Castellano wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> I'm making mknod to some devices in new system like /dev/ttyp0 and so
> and i can't found a list of maj and min numbers.
> Where can i found it?
On 4.x and older, the /dev/MAKEDEV script.
On 5.x and newer, devfs
Hi!,
I'm making mknod to some devices in new system like /dev/ttyp0 and so
and i can't found a list of maj and min numbers.
Where can i found it?
Thanks
--
Jose Nicolas Castellano
Presidente - Asociación No cON Name
Tel: +34 616 727 675
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: www.noconname.org
_
I have a problem with my kernel.
FreeBSD bsd.elesem.net 5.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #4: Mon Mar
7 22:23:10 CET 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/tmp/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE-Rev.5.3-R_bsd i386
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:159
#1 0xc04d11d8 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.
Eric Anderson wrote:
Florent Thoumie wrote:
I don't know if DRBD [1] is a good implementation (Linux only),
but it
works flawlessly, replication is fast (i got ~35MB/s) and it's quite
simple to get it working.
ENBD [2] isn't based on the same concept, it "exports" block devices
Florent Thoumie wrote:
Adam Maloney wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Eric Anderson wrote:
Speaking of filesytems :), I have a real need for a global filesystem
(or
"me too"
I played with CODA a few months ago but it didn't seem to be solid, and
didn't fit my needs. Everything else I've looked at is L
In the last episode (Mar 11), Florent Thoumie said:
> Adam Maloney wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>Speaking of filesytems :), I have a real need for a global filesystem
> >>(or
> >
> >"me too"
>
> I don't know if DRBD [1] is a good implementation (Linux only),
>
All,
I have written a trusted execution module and would appreciate if anyone could
help in testing. This module provides a functionality similar to NetBSD's
verified exec mechanism. Once the design details of this security policy has
been solidified, I will be releasing a white paper which descri
Adam Maloney wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Eric Anderson wrote:
Speaking of filesytems :), I have a real need for a global filesystem
(or
"me too"
I played with CODA a few months ago but it didn't seem to be solid, and
didn't fit my needs. Everything else I've looked at is Linux-only.
Please follo
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Eric Anderson wrote:
Speaking of filesytems :), I have a real need for a global filesystem (or
"me too"
I played with CODA a few months ago but it didn't seem to be solid, and
didn't fit my needs. Everything else I've looked at is Linux-only.
Please follow-up to the list, I
Speaking of filesytems :), I have a real need for a global filesystem (or shared fs, or clustered fs, or whatever), and my favorite OS doesn't have one (that I know of!). I saw that a few years back a few people were working on getting GFS working on FreeBSD, but there's no recent mention of that
> Nullfs works better than unionfs. Unionfs worked well in 4.X.
> > What about the `union' option to regular mounts? Is that safe to use?
[...]
> Last I checked, it [mount -ounion -mi] was very broken, but I'm not sure.
BTW, how is unionfs different from nullfs with the union option?
mou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeremie Le Hen writes:
> A little time ago, phk@ asked for people to submit regression tests for
> virtual filesystem like this [1]. AFAIK, nobody submitted even one test
> so far. This could be a good starting point to have unionfs work
> correctly again. Howeve
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:53:20PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > A few years ago, there was a project making a filesystem, where a file's
> > name will simply be its inode number. It was intended to save on the
> > name-to-inode lookups of a regular filesystem, for applications like
> > Squid
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lou Kamenov writes:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:19:10 -0500, Michael W. Lucas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:38:43PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > But the mere existence of even a basic regression test would be a
> > start and would encou
A few years ago, there was a project making a filesystem, where a file's name
will simply be its inode number. It was intended to save on the name-to-inode
lookups of a regular filesystem, for applications like Squid, which keep file
names in some sort of a database already.
Does anyone know, w
22 matches
Mail list logo
