Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the
other FreeBSD.
What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the
serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout)
Or would I be better #ifdef the
Seán C. Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does this version look?
Needlessly complicated. I'd just copy the entire environment into
malloc()ed space the first time setenv() or putenv() is called.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Does anyone know why "sleep" "select" can not work correctly in FreeBSD 4.5
when the system time is set backward for a long time,i.e several hours. The
behavior is: sleep or select will be blocked for a long time much longer than
expected.
Through testing, we found that these two system calls
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
> I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the
> other FreeBSD.
>
> What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the
> serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout)
>
> Or would I be better #ifdef the commands
Hi all,
I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the
other FreeBSD.
What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the
serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout)
Or would I be better #ifdef the commands and making getchar only used in
uC and my serial
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Seán C. Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While playing around with setenv(), I noticed that it can leak memory
when a program overwrites a variable with a larger value. unsetenv()
will just leak memory. All of this is documented in their man pages
As per the combo in the subject:
Does anyone have any experience with smartctl and a HP Smart Array
642 controller?
When I boot with HP's provided CD, the utility tells me that the
device is SMART enabled.
When I run smartctl version 5.32 under 5.3-STABLE (circa yesterdays's
CVSup), hoever, I ge
Check out the handbook on freebsd.org and lookup 'CVSup' reading that
should in hand help you to upgrade/update your system. as well as reading
the section on upgrading kernel/world.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Amandeep Pannu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems like a dumb question but how do i upgrade FreeBSD 5.3-Rel
Hi all,
Seems like a dumb question but how do i upgrade FreeBSD 5.3-Release to
FreeBSD 5.3-Release-p5.
I am very new to this stuff. Not even know if I am posting in the right
mailing list.
Thanks in advance
A
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing li
At 10:46 AM +0100 2/23/05, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I saw ARG_MAX was increased in 6.0. Recently I noticed that
the lang/fpc-devel port currently hits the old limit in
certain (though rare) cases), and this is annoying.
(some testing revealed that half the increase of 6.0
to 131k params is also ok
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 09:00 am, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:34:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > You don't need sched_lock to check PS_INMEM, proc lock is sufficient
> > (PS_INMEM is magic this way).
>
> I suggested the author of the original letter to get lock on
You did a make buildworld?
You just have to boot in single user mode and run mergemaster -p and
mergemaster.
I hope this helped you
Wouter van Rooij
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:16:56PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> Hello hackers,
> I would like to let you know I've been doing [partial] audit of ioctl()
> code. There are some places, which may interest you. These are:
>
> sys/cam/cam_xpt.c
> sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_fil.c
> sys/contr
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:16:56PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> Hello hackers,
> I would like to let you know I've been doing [partial] audit of ioctl()
> code. There are some places, which may interest you. These are:
>
> sys/cam/cam_xpt.c
> sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_fil.c
> sys/contr
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:34:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> You don't need sched_lock to check PS_INMEM, proc lock is sufficient
> (PS_INMEM is magic this way).
I suggested the author of the original letter to get lock on sched_lock,
because statclock() modifies ru_idrss and ru_isrss values
Hi all,
I've been experimenting with upgrading 4.X to 5.3-STABLE. The challenge
I've been given is that the box to be upgraded is physically
inaccessible and so there's no console access. All I have to work with
is ssh and scp.
In our lab I built a box to 5.3-STABLE. I then used the /usr/obj
d
>>
>> Is it possible to program an "ordinary" (like Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3)) USB
>> host controller into acting as an usb device instead? (just like scsi can).
>>
>> Idea:
>> M$Win-Usb -> FreeBSD-USB#1 .. software .. FreeBSD-USB#2 -> Device
>
>No - this wonn't work.
>Host Controllers are dedi
I saw ARG_MAX was increased in 6.0. Recently I noticed that the
lang/fpc-devel port currently hits the old limit in certain (though rare)
cases), and this is annoying.
(some testing revealed that half the increase of 6.0 to 131k params is also
ok)
Any chance ARG_MAX will be upped in -STABLE too?
Seán C. Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While playing around with setenv(), I noticed that it can leak memory
> when a program overwrites a variable with a larger value. unsetenv()
> will just leak memory. All of this is documented in their man pages.
>
> The latest PR on this (two PR's ment
Hi,
I have a HP Proliant ML110, with a controller Promise FastTrak S150 SX4.
It's a raid sata controller.
At boot system halt with fatal trap 12 and these errors:
ata2-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out
ata2-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out
ata2-master: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET
On Tue, 2005-Feb-22 22:01:12 -0600, Seán C. Farley wrote:
>The latest PR on this (two PR's mentioned in it are closed):
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/19406
...
>Here is a test program along with a patch to stop the leak:
>http://www.farley.org/freebsd/tmp/setenv.tar.bz2
The diff
21 matches
Mail list logo
