On Friday 21 January 2005 00:51, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Milan Obuch wrote this message on Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:00 +0100:
> >
[skip]
> > Great, could we cooperate?
>
> Sure, though Joerg Wunsch has been doing work w/ I2C more recently than
> me, so you might want to drop him an email.
>
Is he
On 01/20/05 01:42:19, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Hello,
Can someone tell me how to resize the freebsd
partition without losing any data? I have a 8GB
freebsd partition and 1/2 GB swap and want to install
another *bsd onto the harddisk.
thanks
-kamal
I don't think you can shrink, but you can grow a fi
I've posted an revised patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/patch-rpc.rstatd
Which has integrated many of Stefan (stefanf@)'s suggestions. I'd
appreciate other comments, and will commit the patch some point next
week if there is no problem with it.
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
-
> I don't think there is a streight way to speed-up the default
> unix time resolution, which is, as far as i know, in
> microseconds.
On i386 (and possibly amd64) platforms you can use the
RDTSC instruction to get a direct measure of processor
cycles elapsed.
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://peop
Hi,
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
For this snippet (which deals with a B+tree) i got results of the form
0.3445866564 microseconds, which means 344.5867 miliseconds.. etc..
You mixed the units up
1 second is 1 000 ms which is 1 000 000 µs which is 1 000 000 000 ns.
Erich
__
Milan Obuch wrote this message on Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:00 +0100:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2005 01:43, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Milan Obuch wrote this message on Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 13:14 +0100:
> > > On Monday 17 January 2005 12:55, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paulo Fragoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi,
:
: We have a NIC wireless SENAO SL-2511CD, it has chipset Prism 3.0. When
: using kernel with new cbb it doesn't work with FreeBSD 5.3:
:
: Jan 18 10:58:41 teste1 kernel: pccard0:
: (manufacturer=0x000
Hello, everyone,
I have a preliminary patch against rpc.rstatd to get it WARNS=6 clean on
both i386 and all Tier-1 64-bit platforms. Since I'm not quite familiar
with the rpc* code I would like to solicit a review on the patch, see
attachment.
Changes include:
- Avoid 64-bit platform com
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:58:23PM -0800, dpk wrote:
> I just got a test server set up for this. The patch worked fine. I lifted
> a pppd command line from a linux mailing list:
>
> pppd /dev/cuaa4 1382400 crtscts noipdefault noauth lock persist connect 'chat
> -v "" CLIENT CLIENTSERVER "\\c"'
>
Dear folks,
During my recent overhaul of our code I found that rstat_timeval
(defined in include/rpcsvc/rstat.h) did the following:
%%%
struct rstat_timeval {
u_int tv_sec;
u_int tv_usec;
};
%%%
While we have timeval defined as:
%%%
struct timeval {
longtv_sec;
>Scott Long writes:
>| On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, yoke an wrote:
>| > My motherboard is using an ICH5 southbridge and your suggestion
is works.
>| > As you said, my sata disks appear to be normal IDE drives but it
is not
>| > running on Raid mode. Currently I'm having 2 HDD, if I do this
Marco Trentini wrote:
Hi, I need to clock the function execution time into a C
program. I know /usr/include/time.h library but I need to
clock the time in milliseconds.
Any suggestions, links?
---snip---
#include
struct timeval tv1,tv2;
struct timezone tz1,tz2;
gettimeofday(&tv1,&tz1);
for (i=0;i<
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having some problems with the following:
> ex1: I have two scsi scanners and I use sane to scan all works well my
> two scanners are /dev/pass0 and /dev/pass1 however when one of them is
> turned of the devi
Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
Hi,
I've been having some problems with the following:
ex1: I have two scsi scanners and I use sane to scan all works well my
two scanners are /dev/pass0 and /dev/pass1 however when one of them is
turned of the device are renumbered (wich is a problem because then I
ha
Hi,
I've been having some problems with the following:
ex1: I have two scsi scanners and I use sane to scan all works well my
two scanners are /dev/pass0 and /dev/pass1 however when one of them is
turned of the device are renumbered (wich is a problem because then I
have to change the sane confi
15 matches
Mail list logo