> Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
> Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
now, that's why I suggested to leave the card's version number in the
description string, as in my original patch!
the patch _is_ for PCM200 v.2 (and p
> I applied the patch that Brooks suggested to my 5.2 system
> uname -a output:
>
> FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE $4: Mon Nov 8 23:27:59 PST
> 2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COGNITION i386
>
>
> I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
> to be related
> Okay, so I got unlazy and threw some stuff together. Try these patches;
> this will default the PCM200 cards to store-and-forward. This might help.
> -ksaihr
[...]
> --- /usr/src/sys/pci/if_dcreg.h Thu Aug 5 13:46:14 2004
> +++ if_dcreg.h Sun Oct 24 13:09:31 2004
> @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@
> #defin
This is from the writers of the Linux driver for the PCM200. I wonder
if there's a good technical manual or guide on writing drivers for that
chipset.
Richard
Original Message
Subject: Re: Linksys PCM200 chipset
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:05:10 +0800
From: Allen(éåå)NDP FAE <[E
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
> Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
> Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
> thought it was the ADMtek chipset, but I suppose there could be a couple
> different ADMtek chipsets ava
Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200
Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support
thought it was the ADMtek chipset, but I suppose there could be a couple
different ADMtek chipsets available ... I'm waiting to hear back from
technical supp
> "Julian" == Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> David Gilbert wrote:
>> I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day,
>> web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce
>> filesystem corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting
>> t
In the last episode (Nov 17), David Gilbert said:
> Another odd thing about snapshots is that the time shown by ls -l is
> mostly current. Havn't found a rule for that yet. ls -lu seems to
> show the creation time even tho the man page for ls says that's the
> last access time.
>
> Since the sna
David Gilbert wrote:
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web,
webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem
corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them.
I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide
an exerci
Another odd thing about snapshots is that the time shown by ls -l is
mostly current. Havn't found a rule for that yet. ls -lu seems to
show the creation time even tho the man page for ls says that's the
last access time.
Since the snapshot itself shouldn't (logically) change after creation,
it w
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web,
webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem
corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them.
I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide
an exercise platform.
Dave.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
> I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
> to be related. Is there an additional patch to the 5.2 code that I can
> apply to take care of the watchdog timeout?
That's odd, to say the least. I looked at the patch, an
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:22:43AM -0500, Sam wrote:
> I know this is likely a stupid question, but no amount of
> googling is making this clear to me.
>
> Which source base is more recent, RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_3?
RELENG_5_3 will be the most up to date for 5.3
RELENG_5 will be the most up to date
Hello all,
I know this is likely a stupid question, but no amount of
googling is making this clear to me.
Which source base is more recent, RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_3?
Cheers,
Sam
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
I applied the patch that Brooks suggested to my 5.2 system
uname -a output:
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE $4: Mon Nov 8 23:27:59 PST
2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COGNITION i386
I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems
to be related. Is there an a
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:58:36PM +, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:48:34AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
> > like following command, but failed.
> >
> > # qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windo
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:48:34AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
> like following command, but failed.
>
> # qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windows.img
>
Yeah physical cdroms don't work currently as mentioned i
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> YT> > an option to IPFIREWALL, you have to build your kernel with
DM> YT> > both IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT:
DM> YT> <...>
DM> YT> I did. See the config contents in originating posting. That was the essence
DM> YT> of the problem -- familiar procedure unexplainably not wor
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2004, at 10:48 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Does anyone know of a way to manipulate the modem control lines from
> > userland?
>
> See , in particular the following ioctls:
Unk thanks.
Dunce cap on :)
> #define TIOCMSET
> --nextPart12368324.QZVX1XDbdm
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Hi,
> Does anyone know of a way to manipulate the modem control lines from userla=
> nd?
> SVR4 has termiox and friends but I can't see
20 matches
Mail list logo
