It appears that we have a leftover line in our conf/files lines. None
of the ports appear to have a 'device kbd' in their config files.
There only appears to be one place where it is used, and it appears to
be unnecessary. I'd like to commit the following, but thought I'd ask
here first to make s
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: kbd.o(.text+0x30e): In function `kbd_register':
: : undefined reference to `__stop_set_kbddriver_set'
dev/kbd/kbd.c optionalatkbd
dev/kbd/kbd.c optionalkbd
de
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : so, Q1: is it possible to compile a 5.3 kernel without kbd,
>
> Doesn't removing atkbd and atkbdc from the kernel do the job?
>
this is waht i get if i remove atkbd and atkbdc:
...
MAKE=make sh /r+d/5.3/
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:11:22AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally I am of the opinion that csh (all versions) should be
removed completely from the base system and relegated entirely to the
ports system. Other than historical reasons there is not much point in
having it in the base system.
you missed the rest of the thread. /bin/csh is not /bin/tcsh. i have
run into a fairly important compatibility problem brought on by this. later.
.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscri
Here are the results of the brief benchmarks that I ran. I posted the
best and worse results out of running each test 5 times.
-
System:
Dual Opteron 244s
RAM 1GB
3 x 36GB U320 SCSI RAID-5 on Adaptec 2120s
-
OS:
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #2: Mon
I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
like following command, but failed.
# qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windows.img
Because find_image_format on qemu/block.c is failed. This
problem can be confirmed like following program.
- - -
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: so, Q1: is it possible to compile a 5.3 kernel without kbd,
Doesn't removing atkbd and atkbdc from the kernel do the job?
Warner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
h
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-11-12 04:11:22 +0100:
> The only real problem with having bash as /bin/sh is that people tend
> to write scripts using bash-specific features and forget that such
> scripts are not portable to systems using a less powerful /bin/sh.
Or the other way around. Bash (at l
Hello? anybody? So how come IPDIVERT option is outright ignored in
system build here?? The system isn't even connected to internet, nor to
any other net anyway!
And as if I don't know how to compile kernel? And it is stock
4.10-RELEASE, too (and 4-STABLE has same problem). The process is fairly
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:37:57 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote:
Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ll /bin/*csh
> -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/csh*
> -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/tcsh*
He meant both shells, not a hardlink. csh and tcsh are
Kevin Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I humbly suggest that /bin contain csh and tcsh. Is that too hard?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ll /bin/*csh
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/csh*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/tcsh*
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL P
hi,
this board (WRAP) has no keyboard, and there is a fix in boot1.S
to take into account such case, but i can't compile a -current a kernel
without kbd (4.x is ok without kbd*), i solved the problem
with a quick hack, just to see if im on the correct track, and a return
with a
re
13 matches
Mail list logo
