On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:39:40AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Their serial BIOS is a pain to use, but for most applications it
> doesn't matter at all...
What problems do you have with it? It seems to work fine for me once
I build FreeBSD to it's fixed baud rate.
--
John Birrell
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:20:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > I'm starting some small project, and I need to decide what hardware
: > will fit its needs. I'm looking for a small single-board computer tha
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:20:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm starting some small project, and I need to decide what hardware
> will fit its needs. I'm looking for a small single-board computer that
> should have minimum: 2 serial ports (RS232 & [RS232 | USB(preferable)]),
> 8-bit databu
Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> db wrote:
> > In my C++ program I need to load some files/classes at runtime, so
> > that users can add "plugins" without recompilling my program. What
> > functions should I use? I'm using FreeBSD 5.3-beta2 btw.
> I'm not sure about C++, though I guess
My FDD shows up again with this patch, thank you.
Previously it was proved twice and failed to attach.
--- /var/tmp/dmesg.prev Mon Sep 13 06:23:51 2004
+++ /var/run/dmesg.boot Mon Sep 13 17:16:17 2004
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 19
> UML (User Mode Linux, user-mode-linux.sf.net) is a port of Linux kernel
> to Linux used as an underlying platform. UML kernel is built as a normal
> user-level executable, that is run on a "host" machine, providing
> "guest" Linux instance. You can log into guest, run processes there,
> attach de
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've found this: 'http://www.compulab.co.il/586core.htm', and I'd appreciate
> to get some opinions on this product. Is anyone using it? How well does it
> work with FreeBSD (or *BSD)? How well FBSD works with its USB controller
> (ScanLogic SL811HST
>I am not trying to suggest that you and/or him are wrong,
>but I cannot find (in manual) anything that would support
>your position that 970 has no block address translation.
>Regarding 16MB superpages, I believe manual explicitly says
>that 970 has no superpages, but I did not go through the
Igor Shmukler writes:
> > > If original author wants to mature OS with MAC and SMP support SELinux
> > > might be a good candidate.
> > > However, Linux does not have jails. Only other OS that has them is
> > > Solaris 10 which does not run on PPC.
> >
> > There's something named User Mode L
On Sep 12, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Igor Shmukler wrote:
Why do you think that 970 does not have BAT registers?
There are 16 special purpose registers specifically to implement
Block
Address Translation.
Because Peter already told us that they have no BAT registers:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/
On Sep 12, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Igor Shmukler wrote:
Why do you think that 970 does not have BAT registers?
There are 16 special purpose registers specifically to implement Block
Address Translation.
Because Peter already told us that they have no BAT registers:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/fr
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 22:51, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:30:31PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 22:01, Joanna Sledzik wrote:
> > > Hi :)
> > > I'm very very begginer in Unix system programming.
> > > What function should I use to catch the struct proc fo
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:01:39PM +0200, Joanna Sledzik wrote:
> Hi :)
> I'm very very begginer in Unix system programming.
> What function should I use to catch the struct proc for some process?
> Is it possible to get the pointer to struct proc using for example the
> pid_t pid as an argument?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:30:31PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 22:01, Joanna Sledzik wrote:
> > Hi :)
> > I'm very very begginer in Unix system programming.
> > What function should I use to catch the struct proc for some process?
> > Is it possible to get the pointer to stru
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 22:01, Joanna Sledzik wrote:
> Hi :)
> I'm very very begginer in Unix system programming.
> What function should I use to catch the struct proc for some process?
> Is it possible to get the pointer to struct proc using for example the pid_t pid
> as an argument?
>From userlan
Hi :)
I'm very very begginer in Unix system programming.
What function should I use to catch the struct proc for some process?
Is it possible to get the pointer to struct proc using for example the pid_t pid
as an argument?
Thanks for help
Joanna Sledzik
___
vxp wrote:
hi
this is another one of my possibly lame questions..
so i wrote a module, it compiles with a few warnings (was too lazy to put
func prototypes, so it outputs warnings about that).
among other things, the compilation produces an icmp.ko (name of my mod)
but when i try to do kldload ./i
[ Excessive crosspost ]
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, 01:20-0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Good localtime()
>
> I'm starting some small project, and I need to decide what hardware
> will fit its needs. I'm looking for a small single-board computer that
> should have minimum: 2 serial ports (RS232 & [R
Good localtime()
I'm starting some small project, and I need to decide what hardware
will fit its needs. I'm looking for a small single-board computer that
should have minimum: 2 serial ports (RS232 & [RS232 | USB(preferable)]),
8-bit databus, FLASH disk, RTC, 486 CPU performance, low power consu
19 matches
Mail list logo
