inet_ntop( )

2004-08-11 Thread Nicolas Bérard Nault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wondered, why does inet_ntop() returns addresses in the format x:x:x:x:x:x:x.x.x.x ? This can be very annoying if that's not what you want. Is there another standard function, other than inet_ntop(), to do the same work ? - -- Nicolas Bérard Nault (

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Well, quickworld seems easy to implement on FreeBSD (maybe I should :have more docs in Makefile.inc1). Sorting in TGTS could be better in :this patch too. Maybe quickworld target itself should go somewhere :else. realquickworld appears, from your description, to be :'everything' in the FreeBSD

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : :As few people already mentioned, add -DCNOCLEAN flag after : :makeworld or makekernel. : : : :And you can disable the building of most contributed : :packages, like gdb, sendmail, cvs, games, etc. See make.co

Re: Where is strnlen() ?

2004-08-11 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thordur Ivar B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I stumbled : upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function : `strnlen' : : Now my programming experience is

Re: fsck and lost+found space

2004-08-11 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Peter Jeremy wrote: > I've done this. The problem is stopping fsck before it starts throwing > away files. Once you stop fsck, you need to do a 'mount -f ...', > rename lost+found to something else, unmount the filesystem and > start lost+found again. This I just tried and

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
:As few people already mentioned, add -DCNOCLEAN flag after :makeworld or makekernel. : :And you can disable the building of most contributed :packages, like gdb, sendmail, cvs, games, etc. See make.conf(5). : :-- :Sarunas Vancevicius What 'quickworld' does in DFly is skip the bootstrap, bui

Re: Where is strnlen() ?

2004-08-11 Thread Thordur Ivar B.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:03:23 -0700 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:32:54PM +, Thordur Ivar B. wrote: > > While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I > > stumbled upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of >

Re: Where is strnlen() ?

2004-08-11 Thread James Housley
Thordur Ivar B. wrote: While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I stumbled upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function `strnlen' Now my programming experience is nothing to brag about but I wonder why strnlen is not a part of FreeBSD's libc

Re: Where is strnlen() ?

2004-08-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:32:54PM +, Thordur Ivar B. wrote: > While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I stumbled > upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function > `strnlen' > > Now my programming experience is nothing to brag about but

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-11 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, John Baldwin wrote: > The i830 DRM stuff is ported in a branch of DRI, but it's not in DRI head > because of a security problem with the code. Just out of curiousity, does this support the original i810 chipset? ie: agp0: mem 0xff00-0xff07,0xf400-0xf7ff irq

Where is strnlen() ?

2004-08-11 Thread Thordur Ivar B.
While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I stumbled upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function `strnlen' Now my programming experience is nothing to brag about but I wonder why strnlen is not a part of FreeBSD's libc. I think that the use

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 07:07 am, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Hi there, > > Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES, > there's currently evidence of support for i810/830 chips in FreeBSD, > which (I suspect) is the probable reason why DRI is not enabled on my > box

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Sarunas Vancevicius wrote: On 16:07, Wed 11 Aug 04, Sarunas Vancevicius wrote: On 00:36, Wed 11 Aug 04, Geert Hendrickx wrote: Hi, is there any way (or could it be implemented) to rebuild only the changes in world and kernel sources after a cvsup? DragonFly BSD features "make quickworld" and "ma

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Sarunas Vancevicius
On 16:07, Wed 11 Aug 04, Sarunas Vancevicius wrote: > On 00:36, Wed 11 Aug 04, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there any way (or could it be implemented) to rebuild only the > > changes in world and kernel sources after a cvsup? DragonFly BSD > > features "make quickworld" and "make qu

5.2.1 performance problem

2004-08-11 Thread igor
Folks, My box is Dell PowerEdge 4600 with: Dual Xeon 2.4GHz aac0 Dell PERC 3/Di with 10x 70Gb HDDs, em0 82544EI, bge0, fxp0, 6GB RAM of which only 4GB being used, This is a Usenet server running INN 2.4.1 (release) connected to Cisco GSR 12416 with Gigabit Ethernet em0; physical connection is 100

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Sarunas Vancevicius
On 16:07, Wed 11 Aug 04, Sarunas Vancevicius wrote: > On 00:36, Wed 11 Aug 04, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on laserbeam.sv.org > > X-Spam-Level: > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Sarunas Vancevicius
On 00:36, Wed 11 Aug 04, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on laserbeam.sv.org > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.63 > Status: RO > Content-Length: 941 > Lines: 24 > > Hi,

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:36:06AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > Hi, > > is there any way (or could it be implemented) to rebuild only the > changes in world and kernel sources after a cvsup? DragonFly BSD > features "make quickworld" and "make quickkernel" which does exactly > that. 'make

Re: make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2004.08.11 00:36:06 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > Hi, > > is there any way (or could it be implemented) to rebuild only the > changes in world and kernel sources after a cvsup? DragonFly BSD > features "make quickworld" and "make quickkernel" which does exactly > that. You can do that al

No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-11 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Hi there, Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES, there's currently evidence of support for i810/830 chips in FreeBSD, which (I suspect) is the probable reason why DRI is not enabled on my box (FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT from yesterday, latest X.Org). I also found traces

buglet in nfs_mountroot

2004-08-11 Thread Ted Unangst
in freebsd 4.10 nfs/nfs_vfsops.c:nfs_mountroot, the handling of swap_mp is incorrect. the code at line 498 appears useless, and furthermore uses swap_mp without initialization. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

make "quickworld"? (like in DragonFly)

2004-08-11 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Hi, is there any way (or could it be implemented) to rebuild only the changes in world and kernel sources after a cvsup? DragonFly BSD features "make quickworld" and "make quickkernel" which does exactly that. I understand this might result in some conflicts, and DragonFly also advises to do

Re: fsck and lost+found space

2004-08-11 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2004-Aug-11 09:58:21 +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:54:35PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote.. >> On Wed, 2004-Aug-11 08:17:39 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: >> >* Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 23:52 -0400]: >> >> I was hoping for some option in fsck to

Re: fsck and lost+found space

2004-08-11 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:54:35PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote.. > On Wed, 2004-Aug-11 08:17:39 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > >* Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 23:52 -0400]: > >> I was hoping for some option in fsck to allow an alternate lost+found > >> directory on another dev

Re: fsck and lost+found space

2004-08-11 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2004-Aug-11 08:17:39 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: >* Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 23:52 -0400]: >> I was hoping for some option in fsck to allow an alternate lost+found >> directory on another device, but no such luck. This isn't possible - all fsck does is to creat