>
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > sometimes we get
> > load: 0.04 cmd: dmesg 13453 [nfsrcvlk] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 148k
> >
> > and looking through the code, there might be some connection between
> > sbwait and nfsrcvlk, but i doubt that it's sockets that im running out
> > off, n
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Xin LI wrote:
> I have a patchset to remove tailing spaces, convert leading spaces to
> tabs, and removes spaces before tabs. The patchset is generated with the
> following shell command sequence:
>
> sed -i '' -E s/\ \ /\ /g *.c *.h
> sed -i '' -E s/^\ \ \ \ \ \
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, pradeep reddy punnam wrote:
> i am modifing my ../netinet/ip_input.c code so that kernel can inform a
> user process about the arrival of a packet, i want to use signaling
> mechanism for this , i know the pid of the process to which the signal
> should be send, i am looing fo
Hi folks,
I have a patchset to remove tailing spaces, convert leading spaces
to tabs, and removes spaces before tabs. The patchset is generated
with the following shell command sequence:
sed -i '' -E s/\ \ /\ /g *.c *.h
sed -i '' -E s/^\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /\ /g *.c *.h
sed -i '' -E s/\
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Danny Braniss wrote:
> sometimes we get
> load: 0.04 cmd: dmesg 13453 [nfsrcvlk] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 148k
>
> and looking through the code, there might be some connection between
> sbwait and nfsrcvlk, but i doubt that it's sockets that im running out
> off, neither mbufs, sinc
Well, possibly due to editorial content, kern/50827 has been completely
ignored. Not sure exactly the correct method of bringing something like
this up, but am I the only one who finds flock(), dotlock, and fcntl()
locks insufficient for their needs? Originally, this patch resulted from
porting a
In the last episode (Jun 23), Sven Willenberger said:
> I am having a lot of trouble trying to make the following work (after
> some exhaustive googling etc)
>
> Goal: 2 interfaces (em0 and em1) to be "combined" or bonded into one
> virtual interface so as to provide both increased throughput and
>
> > Danny Braniss wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > > We have a host running samba under -stable 4.10, and quiet frequently
> > >it becomes uresponsive, hitting ^T gives
> > >
> > >load: 0.00 cmd: ls 12807 [sbwait] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 160k
> > >
> > >so my guess is that we are running out of some resource
I am having a lot of trouble trying to make the following work (after
some exhaustive googling etc)
Goal: 2 interfaces (em0 and em1) to be "combined" or bonded into one
virtual interface so as to provide both increased throughput and
failover. Both physical ports connected to either the same or di
Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - a few questions about UFS2 and snapshots:
I'm not a kernel guru, but just a user like you, so take my
answers with a pinch of salt ...
> 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible filesystem snapshots and
> _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:38:00PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> We have a host running samba under -stable 4.10, and quiet frequently
> it becomes uresponsive, hitting ^T gives
>
> load: 0.00 cmd: ls 12807 [sbwait] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 160k
>
> so my guess is that we are running out of s
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Alexey Zagarin wrote:
Hello!
Does anybody know, why sshd call getpwnam() even if user is
authenticating via PAM? This broke remote authentication (RADIUS,
TACACS+) when user doesn't exist in local password database.
This is typical behavior for most account based PAM appl
12 matches
Mail list logo
