Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian said: > Andrew Beals wrote: > >Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD > >distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does > >everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? > > Is t

Re: pkg_create @cwd and @srcdir

Brenden Grace wrote: In this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-June/001673.html some people seem to think that @cwd is broken. The man pages do not explicitly state how @cwd should operate, but currently the directory must exist for pkg_create to run properly. This is

Re: Pthread / Memory Problem.

man pthread_detach? Cole wrote: Hey I have recently ported a linux application to FreeBSD, and i had to change a number of libraries and so forth. I have now managed to get it working correctly, with no build errors or warnings. The program runs correctly as well too, and there are no forseable pro

Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?

Andrew Beals wrote: Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? Is there any for IMAP? -- Alin-Adrian Anton Reversed Hell Networks GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E

Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?

On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Andrew Beals wrote: > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD > distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does > everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? This isn't Linux. :-) POP servers are

simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?

Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? -- More coffee! http://cinnamon.com/~bandy/ DoD#1005 __

Email of tackerman or pdeuskar?

I'm trying to reach tackerman or pdeuskar from Intel for some time now regarding the em driver. It seems their @freebsd.org email addresses don't work at all. Neither has a /var/forward/ file or it is empty. Does someone have their real @intel.com email adresses? -- Andre

Re: KVA space problems?

On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:15:44PM -0400, lost inferno wrote: > I posted something to stable about this, but Im wondering if anyone has > seen this... I saw something over here ( http://gobsd.com/node/view/39 ) > that made me really consider my options as the 4.x series comes to an > end... is

Re: KVA space problems?

Sounds like someone's a drama queen there. All our boxes are up 24/7 and only go down for patch / hardware issue hardly the picture drhodus it trying to paint there. N.B. boxes are a mixture of 4.8, 4.9, 5.1 and 5.2.1. Steve - Original Message - From: "lost inferno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Network buffer allocations: mbuma, PLEASE TEST

Hi, If you're running -CURRENT, please test this: http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mbuma2.diff It is several extensions to UMA and mbuf & cluster allocation built on top of it. Once you apply the patch from src/, you need to rebuild and reinstall src/usr.bin/netstat, src/usr.b

Re: fopen("file","a")

Yes, thank's everybody. Unfortunately I thought I blocked this (old)mail message into the MTA's queue, however, it seems it passed out today, by my mistake. Regards, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Reversed Hell Networks GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserve

pkg_create @cwd and @srcdir

In this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-June/001673.html some people seem to think that @cwd is broken. The man pages do not explicitly state how @cwd should operate, but currently the directory must exist for pkg_create to run properly. This is extremely annoying

KVA space problems?

I posted something to stable about this, but Im wondering if anyone has seen this... I saw something over here ( http://gobsd.com/node/view/39 ) that made me really consider my options as the 4.x series comes to an end... is anyone else looking into this? Perhaps i would be best off to move o

Pthread / Memory Problem.

Hey I have recently ported a linux application to FreeBSD, and i had to change a number of libraries and so forth. I have now managed to get it working correctly, with no build errors or warnings. The program runs correctly as well too, and there are no forseable problems. The other day i noticed

internet access from jail, on host acting as nat gateway

Asking here, because I got no replies in questions@ :( I'm having a problem here, where I can't access the internet from inside my jails. The host and another computer on the lan (fxp0) have no problems connecting to the internet via natd. I don't have any problems for connections between the host

Re: fopen("file","a")

Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if ( (fp_queue=fopen(fqueue,"a")) ==NULL);//will wait for locks remove the semicolon. > { > perror("fopen(fqueue,\"a\")"); > //exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > } DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: fopen("file","a")

- Original Message - From: "Anton Alin-Adrian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 5:27 PM Subject: fopen("file","a") > Hey folks. > > Running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE > > I am just wondering: > > man fopen > ---man--- > Upon successful completion f

Re: fopen("file","a")

On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:27:06PM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > if ( (fp_queue=fopen(fqueue,"a")) ==NULL);//will wait for locks ^ Extra semicolon. > { > perror("fopen(

fopen("file","a")

Hey folks. Running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE I am just wondering: man fopen ---man--- Upon successful completion fopen(), fdopen() and freopen() return a FILE pointer. Otherwise, NULL is returned and the global variable errno is set to indicate the error. ---man--- However, the f