> From: Sam Leffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi list,
> >>>
> >>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
> >
Daniel Ellard wrote:
And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost blinded me. I was
confusing with char[16], which has the +1 byte for the null
terminating, but the malloc(16) hasn't...
No, that's still not quite it...
char[16] allocates exactly 16 characters. Period. There's no extra
s
> And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost blinded me. I was
> confusing with char[16], which has the +1 byte for the null
> terminating, but the malloc(16) hasn't...
No, that's still not quite it...
char[16] allocates exactly 16 characters. Period. There's no extra
space on the end
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 21:27 +0300]:
tmp = (char *) malloc(strlen(s)); // line 68
Hmm, you need strlen(s)+1 bytes to store the string -- don't forget
the trailing null byte.
Nicolas
And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost blinded me.
* Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 21:27 +0300]:
> tmp = (char *) malloc(strlen(s)); // line 68
Hmm, you need strlen(s)+1 bytes to store the string -- don't forget
the trailing null byte.
Nicolas
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello hackers !
Before anything else, I must mention I am running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, and
that is the OS where I encounter the problem.
I was developing some functions fooling around for parsing some bigger
opensource project's config file and look what happened:
There are many functions i
At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
Hi list,
this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature compared
to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
The
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, GiZmen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am runnign freebsd 5.2.1 on 386 arch with two rl lan cards. My mainboard
> is on VIA KT 266A with AMD athlon 1.1.
> I read man polling and i have HZ=1000. My problem is that when i set up
> sysctl variable kern.polling.enable=1 my interrupts great
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, GiZmen wrote:
G> I am runnign freebsd 5.2.1 on 386 arch with two rl lan cards. My mainboard
G> is on VIA KT 266A with AMD athlon 1.1.
G> I read man polling and i have HZ=1000. My problem is that when i set up
G> sysctl variable kern.polling.enable=1 my interrupts greatly incre
Hello,
I am runnign freebsd 5.2.1 on 386 arch with two rl lan cards. My mainboard
is on VIA KT 266A with AMD athlon 1.1.
I read man polling and i have HZ=1000. My problem is that when i set up
sysctl variable kern.polling.enable=1 my interrupts greatly increase.
When my system is idle and indicate
Hi list,
this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature compared
to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
Regards,
Helge
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Threads are pretty portable these days, obviously making it a compile
time option could work, but then again performance would be nice and
it is _our_ tar. ;)
Also, unless you mean 'aio' or 'another process' by
"non-blocking/async IO" then I'm pretty sure you are wrong, a
* Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040424 03:14] wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 01:59:13AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Have you guys thought of using aio or at least another process
> > to parallelize IO? (One to read files, and one to write out the
> > archive)
> >
> > Actuall
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Other than reading a few GB of data, is there a way to flush
> out the cache copy of a file I've written?
I don't know how this will fit into your application, but unmounting and
remounting the filesystem is a way that springs to mind. Perhaps not as
isloated as you'd lik
[ Redirected to -net ]
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:50:57PM -0700, David Yeske wrote:
> I'm in a situation where I need to emulate multiple ethernet devices with
> different mac addresses. I have gotten far enough to have this.
>
> I ran ngctl and then ran
> "mkpeer . eiface hook ether"
>
> I the
15 matches
Mail list logo
