Re: BDM under current

2004-02-14 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:22:12 + Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:02:47PM -0500, James Housley wrote: > > >does anyone know whether i can use gdb + bdm under freebsd ? > > > > Probably not, I had it working well under 3.x, never really got it > > working

Adding 'realclean' target to /usr/src/Makefile

2004-02-14 Thread Garance A Drosihn
In the instructions I am writing up for a sparc64 change, I wrote that people should: rm -Rf /usr/obj/usr/src/* to make sure they got rid of everything in the previous buildworld. Some developers reminded me that this isn't always the right thing to do (depending on symlinks or on various setti

Re: machine/atmoic.h

2004-02-14 Thread William M. Grim
Atomic functions often serve purposes in mutexes and SMP. You want to be able to lock a mutex in one cycle (at least few enough cycles guaranteed to be executed before another process is scheduled). If you try to lock a mutex without using atomic functions, then two processes might try to loc

Re: BDM under current

2004-02-14 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:02:47PM -0500, James Housley wrote: > >does anyone know whether i can use gdb + bdm under freebsd ? > > Probably not, I had it working well under 3.x, never really got it working > in 4.x I wouldn't mind following this up, alas, I don't have any BDM gear here. It is so

a very very wierd problem.......

2004-02-14 Thread Suken Woo
hi list: using the JDBC(MySQL JDBC CONNECTOR 3.0.10-stable) connect to mysql under 4.9R+jdk1.4.2-p6 i ifconfig fxp0 down for a few hours and ifconfig fxp0 up again. the socket will occured : %sockstat | grep 3306 mysql mysqld 157 5 tcp4 *:3306 *:* root java 1671 7 tcp4 192.168.168.138:3306 192.168.

Re: machine/atmoic.h

2004-02-14 Thread Lev Walkin
Eirik Nygaard wrote: Hi... I am just wondering what the atomic_* functions in machine/atmoic.h does. I have read the assembly code and more or less understood it, but I still don't see the need for it. So if anyone would enlighten me that would be great. Think about parallel threads of execution

machine/atmoic.h

2004-02-14 Thread Eirik Nygaard
Hi... I am just wondering what the atomic_* functions in machine/atmoic.h does. I have read the assembly code and more or less understood it, but I still don't see the need for it. So if anyone would enlighten me that would be great. -- Eirik Nygaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]Never let a computer k

Re: FreeBSD 5.2 v/s FreeBSD 4.9 MFLOPS performance (gcc3.3.3 v/s gcc2.9.5)

2004-02-14 Thread Alexandr Kovalenko
Hello, Wes Peters! On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:29:34AM -0800, you wrote: > On Monday 09 February 2004 13:20, Juan Tumani wrote: > > I have an Intel D845GE m/b w/ a P4 1.7 CPU and I have the box setup > > to dual boot to either 4.9 or 5.2. Both OS are right off the latest > > posted iso CD image,