On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:26:54PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:23:58PM -0700 I heard the voice of
>Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
>> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>> >
>> >yes, we need something like
>> >
>> >struct pci_device_info {
>> >uint32_tpcii
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rahul Siddharthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: As for the "copyright (C) the FreeBSD project" bit: As I understand,
: editors/publishers who compile anthologies can claim copyright on the
: anthologies (the act of anthologisation itself being a creative
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion, but we have to wait for
a 1.0 Release, and this would be something that should be done gradually.. for
example moving the ports tree first.
cheers,
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Michel TALON wrote:
> > And, further, some of us don't have (and don't want) CD burners, and even
> > if we had 'em, don't want to burn (no pun intended ;) a CD blank just to
> > install an OS, when we can just (re-)use 2 floppies and do it across the
> > LAN from a local FTP m
This is driving me insane...
I would like to provide a client with a .o file so that he can link
static against my library. Unfortunatly I need to hide nearly all
the symbols in my object file.
For a shared object this works out super easy, all I do is generate
the .so file, then run strip -N on
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:08:08PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > PXE boot against an automated backup/restore service would be much more
> > useful for this.
>
> Assuming they have PXE and a supported card..
One point that hasn't been made here against PXE (well, not against it,
but not in f
Somewhere around Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 17:11 , the world stopped
and listened as [EMAIL PROTECTED] graced us with
this profound tidbit of wisdom that would fulfill the enjoyment of
future generations:
> --
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:57:56 +0100
> From: Ma
Richard Coleman wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
All,
Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install
floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of a burden on the
Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to
constantly battle the floppies.
FreeBSD/
On 2004-01-09 11:38 -0600, Sean Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I admit to having not tried it, but I wonder how well OpenCM
> (http://www.opencm.org/) would compare. I think it would have a smaller
> footprint than Subversion.
I have prepared a port of OpenCM, but didn't have time to test it
Scott Long wrote:
All,
Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install
floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of a burden on the
Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to
constantly battle the floppies.
FreeBSD/i386 is the only port lef
I go through the love/"why am I spending my time learning an obscure
language" kind of relationship. :)
If you want to buy books, good ones are:
http://www.forth.com/Content/Handbook/Handbook.html
http://www.forth.com/Content/fat/fat.html
You can get PDF versions if you download the trial version
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
DR> I've been re-evaluating the current subversion over the last couple of
DR> weeks and its holding up pretty well so far. It still misses the
DR> repeated merge thing that p4 does so well but in practice, merging does
DR> seem to be a lot easier than with C
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> Narvi wrote:
> > > We can all be glad that it hasn't mattered and might never matter that
> > > the FreeBSD IP situation is so shabby, I suppose because it sends the
> > > message that it's all essentially a Gentlemen's Agreement, with only a
> > > f
Scott Long wrote:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:35 -0700:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:35 -0700:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't soli
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:35 -0700:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
> >the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
> >the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
> >re
Narvi wrote:
> > We can all be glad that it hasn't mattered and might never matter that
> > the FreeBSD IP situation is so shabby, I suppose because it sends the
> > message that it's all essentially a Gentlemen's Agreement, with only a
> > few violators who are more-or-less tolerated.
> >
>
> It
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
replies :).
I dislike the boot menu in CURRENT, and would prefer
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:23:58PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> >
> >yes, we need something like
> >
> >struct pci_device_info {
> >uint32_tpciid;
> >charbrand[64];
> >charmodel[6
Quoting Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> > interdisciplinary people left in the project. The SMP interactions
> > that John mentions are not trivial... they would challenge *ME* and
> > regardless of what people think about my social mores I think most
>
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whatever. I've consulted lawyers on this who assure me that it is
> legal. You've admitted to not knowing US Copyright law and are aguing
> emotion, which is why I didn't reply to the rest of your message.
You obviously don't want to discuss this,
Sorry to jump in the conversation so late, and without reading the
entire thread to date, but has anyone considered tla as an scm, it
handles merging and branching much more sanely than cvs or svn, not to
mention the benefits of distributed development and the dumb server
model. and there are t
Hi hackers,
I have to develop small server which has to manage custom microcontroller via
parallel port interface.
Does anyone know good manual/documentation about UNIX / BSD parallel port
programming ?
Thanks in advance!
Vladimir
Markus Brueffer wondered why:
tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
is not the same as
tar -xvfj file.tar.bz2
What I'm asking me, is why the "-" makes a difference, though I haven't looked
at the sources, yet. The manpage states, that the "-" is only optional, so
"tar -jxfv" and "tar jxvf" should be equiva
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
> Narvi wrote:
>
> >>"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Whatever. I've consulted lawyers on this who assure me that it is
> >>>legal. You've admitted to not knowing US Copyright law and are aguing
> >>>emotion, which is why I
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:57:56PM +0100, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> This discussion is just like when the i386 support was removed from the
> GENERIC kernel, a lot of noise about old systems that wouldn't be able
> to run (or benefit) from FreeBSD 5 anyway.
No, this is nothing like that.
> >>And,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> This is getting stupid!
>
>
> > Here at Vicor, we have over a thousand machines spread over about
> > 20 sites. About 10 of those machines have cdrom drives. Our plans call
> > for moving from 4.x to 5.x, probably at the end of 2004, maybe early
> >
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Scott Long wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Here at Vicor, we have over a thousand machines spread over about
> > 20 sites. About 10 of those machines have cdrom drives. Our plans call
> > for moving from 4.x to 5.x, probably at the end of 2004, maybe
This is getting stupid!
This discussion is just like when the i386 support was removed from the
GENERIC kernel, a lot of noise about old systems that wouldn't be able
to run (or benefit) from FreeBSD 5 anyway.
And, further, some of us don't have (and don't want) CD burners, and even
if we had '
Narvi wrote:
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Whatever. I've consulted lawyers on this who assure me that it is
legal. You've admitted to not knowing US Copyright law and are aguing
emotion, which is why I didn't reply to the rest of your message.
It is not clear that t
Hi, re the question from Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Jan 2004:
> forth looks like it's an interesting .. language.
> Can anyone recommend good (or just
> any, really) introductory material?
---
If you do want to get into Forth, you can probably find
some of the following
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:50:59PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Avleen Vig, and lo! it spake thus:
While it is indeed true that most machines since 1997 will support this
CD format, please take in to account:
And, further, some o
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The (conceptually) simplest approach would be for all drivers to
advertise the PCI IDs that they can support (together with a priority)
in a manner that would allow such a list to be generated automatically.
yes, we need somethi
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Keep in mind that older systems probably won't boot over the network
> without a netboot ROM or similar. The netboot ROM images are (or
> were) in the distribution but aren't much use without an EPROM
> burner.
I believe that in most cases you can dd the
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:52:08AM +0100, Daniel Lang wrote:
>Matthew D. Fuller wrote on Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:58:11AM -0600:
>[..]
>> And, further, some of us don't have (and don't want) CD burners, and even
>> if we had 'em, don't want to burn (no pun intended ;) a CD blank just to
>> install a
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:30:17PM -0800, Avleen Vig wrote:
>A simple website which lets you choose what drivers you want (anyone
>seen the .muttrc config page? :)
>That should be really easy to do with a little perl CGI.
>I might take a crack at this in the next week or so.
FWIW, Plan-9 ( http://
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The (conceptually) simplest approach would be for all drivers to
> advertise the PCI IDs that they can support (together with a priority)
> in a manner that would allow such a list to be generated automatically.
yes, we need something like
struct pci_dev
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Here's the question perhaps more appropriate for hackers@:
I looked into ripping the ascii-art out, but am quite scared. However,
forth looks like it's an interesting (love/hate kind of thing) language,
and I'd like to get my hands on it. Can anyone recommend good (or just
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:38:11PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
>> : 2) use pciconf -l (or direct access to /dev/pci) to retrieve the PCI
>> :IDs of unclaimed devices, look them up in a list of
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:50:59PM -0800 I heard the voice of
> Avleen Vig, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > While it is indeed true that most machines since 1997 will support this
> > CD format, please take in to account:
>
> And, further, some o
In the last episode (Jan 09), Roman Neuhauser said:
> I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for
> current@, the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing,
> so sorry for the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't
> solicit many replies :).
>
> I dislike t
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Whatever. I've consulted lawyers on this who assure me that it is
> > legal. You've admitted to not knowing US Copyright law and are aguing
> > emotion, which is why I didn't reply to the rest of
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
replies :).
I dislike the boot menu in CURRENT, and would prefer something that
* does
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
> I presume the above means a PXE *client*. This would be cool, but by no
> means trivial. I looked at this in the past when I wanted to network
> boot FreeBSD on a couple of machines that did not support a boot ROM and
> reached a dead end; I ended
I previously posted this on -fs but got no responce so I'm trying -hackers.
Building a box thats going to house many billions of small files. Think
innd circa 1998 or someone trying to house AOLs mail system on cyrus or
something. To this end I've hung a 3.3TB hardware raid off a BSD box
broken
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Narvi!
> Friday, January 9, 2004, 4:28:57 PM, you wrote:
>
> >> DR> 3. Converting the repository. This is a tricky one - I tried the
> >> DR>current version of the migration scripts and they barfed and died
> >> DR>pretty quickly. Still,
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
> I've been re-evaluating the current subversion over the last couple of
> weeks and its holding up pretty well so far. It still misses the
> repeated merge thing that p4 does so well but in practice, merging
> does seem to be a lot easier than with CVS due t
On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 14:04, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> Robert Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have you noticed that i am _not_ using the '-'?
> tar xvfj file.tar.bz2 <-
>
> if you leave the '-' away then tar does not care
> about the order of the parameters.
>
> when you are using the dash be
> > There are several documents linked off of http://www.freebsd.org/releng
> > that describe how to build a release. It's not nearly as arcane of a
> > process as it used to be 5 years ago. The biggest barrier to entry is
> > probably disk space. You'll need a good 5GB free to hold the CVS repo
Hi,
when trying to intercept UDP packet after changing the protocol number
from 17 to a user one (99) in the ip_input.c file. when trying to
regenrate the packet after inserting some bit errors an error message
appears in the reciever telling that The udp checksum is incorrect even if
i just change
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
> : 2) use pciconf -l (or direct access to /dev/pci) to retrieve the PCI
> :IDs of unclaimed devices, look them up in a list of supported PCI
> :devices, and load the appropriate module.
> There's
This particular card is a controllerless modem (ie. it is a winmodem),
and has no UART.
Seeya...Q
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 21:33, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Sorry for my basic knownledge about freebsd hacking and english language.
>
> Problem: i need to use an internal PCI modem, 56k.
> I found USR (
Hello, Narvi!
Friday, January 9, 2004, 4:28:57 PM, you wrote:
>> DR> 3. Converting the repository. This is a tricky one - I tried the
>> DR>current version of the migration scripts and they barfed and died
>> DR>pretty quickly. Still, I'm pretty sure that the svn developers
>> DR>are p
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
: 2) use pciconf -l (or direct access to /dev/pci) to retrieve the PCI
:IDs of unclaimed devices, look them up in a list of supported PCI
:devices, and load the appropriate module.
There's some ongo
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 2004.01.08 21:39:07 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:
: >
: > : and the "Copyright" page has that plus a simi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:
: > :
: > : And yet the "Legal" page carries a claim of co
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:53 +0300:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:29:34 +
> Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The three main showstoppers for moving FreeBSD to subversion would be:
> [...]
>
> > 2. Support for $FreeBSD$ - user-specified keywords are not supported
> >and wo
YACINE GHANJAOUI writes:
> Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
> Thanks,
This is really questions@ material, but...
$ tar -y
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.f
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:
> :
> : And yet the "Legal" page carries a claim of copyright for "The FreeBSD
> : Project"
>
> It is a psudonymous work by The FreeBSD Project.
Are you sa
Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> I'm going to propose a different solution that was brought up about
> two years ago (although I can't find it now).
>
> You start with something like the CD boot image mentioned, that is
> a 3-5 Meg iso image that basically contains what is now on the
> floppies (perhaps w
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ryan Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Something like this might also jeopardize the
> : project's "not for profit" status.
>
> The project is not a legally incorporated entity at this time, and
> never has been in the past.
And yet the "Legal"
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Doug!
> Thursday, January 8, 2004, 8:29:34 PM, you wrote:
>
> DR> 3. Converting the repository. This is a tricky one - I tried the
> DR>current version of the migration scripts and they barfed and died
> DR>pretty quickly. Still, I'm pre
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Markus Brueffer wrote:
MB>On Friday 09 January 2004 11:27, Robert Klein wrote:
MB>> On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 10:33, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
MB>> > Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MB>> > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
MB>> > > > tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
MB>> > >
On Friday 09 January 2004 11:27, Robert Klein wrote:
> On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 10:33, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > > > tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > tar xvjf
> >
> > i do not think that the order of t
Robert Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > i do not think that the order of the parameters
> > have any influence on the result.
>
> No, but the filename has to be right after the f. The following
> commands work, and both have the same result:
>
Hello, Doug!
Thursday, January 8, 2004, 8:29:34 PM, you wrote:
DR> 3. Converting the repository. This is a tricky one - I tried the
DR>current version of the migration scripts and they barfed and died
DR>pretty quickly. Still, I'm pretty sure that the svn developers
DR>are planning to
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:29:34 +
Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The three main showstoppers for moving FreeBSD to subversion would be:
[...]
> 2. Support for $FreeBSD$ - user-specified keywords are not supported
>and won't be until after svn-1.0 by the looks of things.
subversi
On 2004.01.08 21:39:07 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) writes:
>
> : and the "Copyright" page has that plus a similar claim for
> : "FreeBSD, Inc." (For 2004, even.)
>
> That should be changed.
To? I have notic
Sorry for my basic knownledge about freebsd hacking and english language.
Problem: i need to use an internal PCI modem, 56k.
I found USR (NO winmodem) pci 56k but it were not right detect by freebsd.
test# uname -rs
FreeBSD 5.2-RC1
I add all his id in:
src/sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c
src/sys/dev/sio/s
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:00:40PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> You still need the right drivers, ie which SCSI controller/network/... cards
> you have to get a minimal install is _more_ when you are doing FTP (you need
> a network).
Out of around 300+ installs of FreeBSD I've done over the
On Friday 09 January 2004 19:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> 2) use pciconf -l (or direct access to /dev/pci) to retrieve the PCI
>IDs of unclaimed devices, look them up in a list of supported PCI
>devices, and load the appropriate module.
You know, when I wrote the code in sysinstall to
On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 10:33, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > > tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
> > tar xvjf
> i do not think that the order of the parameters
> have any influence on the result.
No, but the filename has
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of
> > "(semi-)freeze" aren't as widely known as you seem to think.
> > E. g. yesterday or today I received a
Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> > tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
> tar xvjf
i do not think that the order of the parameters
have any influence on the result.
-josef
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
> YACINE GHANJAOUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
>
> tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
tar xvjf
regards,
le
--
Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Systemad
YACINE GHANJAOUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a problem when recompiling my Unix Kernel. I want to enable
> ipchains modules.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html
greets, josef
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
YACINE GHANJAOUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
tar xvfj file.tar.bz2
see man tar for details.
greets, josef
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:48:55AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >BTW Does camcontrol rescan cause the devices to be detected? Perhaps
> >sysinstall could be "enhanced" to perform this duty as part of it's
> >reprobe machinations.
>
> S
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incorrect. Scanning SCSI buses is something that does not happen
> automatically. There is magic in the boot process that makes it happen
> near the end, right before the kernel looks for the root device.
> However, that is the exception to the rule. If y
I have a problem when recompiling my Unix Kernel. I want to enable
ipchains modules.
Besides this anyone can help me with a detailed docs to use Divert-Sockets
to intercept and inject Packets?
Thanks,
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.free
Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
Thanks,
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2004 17:32, Scott Long wrote:
Scott also said stuff like SCSI cards won't get probed if a module is
loaded but I can't see why that is true.. The module will load, the
device get detected, and then sysinstall is told to reprobe the hardware,
so it shoul
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 05:50:59PM +1030 I heard the voice of
Daniel O'Connor, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I don't necessarily agree here - I think sysinstall is a better place because
> it's much much easier to write stuff for it than the loader. In the example
> you mention the only reason to u
* Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 00:02 -0700]:
> Well, except when mfsroot.gz becomes too large to fit on a single
> floppy. Right now it is about 90k away from that. What happens when
> mount_nfsv4 gets put on there? John Baldwin and I already spent a
> day over the holiday break ma
On Friday 09 January 2004 17:32, Scott Long wrote:
> > Scott also said stuff like SCSI cards won't get probed if a module is
> > loaded but I can't see why that is true.. The module will load, the
> > device get detected, and then sysinstall is told to reprobe the hardware,
> > so it should pick i
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 18:20, Avleen Vig wrote:
I understand it is difficult to maintain the floppies. I wish I
understood them better :-) Is it not possible to have "ftp install"
floppies, which do nothing more than simple FTP installations?
It wouldn't make it any e
86 matches
Mail list logo
