On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:44:49PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Obviously for >4GB you need PAE
Or an AMD64 machine. (which don't cost anymore than a machine you'd be
worrying aboiut PAE on)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Obviously for >4GB you need PAE
but at one stage it was required that to run with 54GB of ram the kernel
base was moved down from the 3GB point (0xc000) to the 2GB point
(0x8000)
Is this still required?
And what is the configuration value to achieve this?
I've been trying to thing os sear
First of all I do not want to start any kind of war here.
I studied results of Felix's benchmark some time ago and now I think I have a
possible explanation for what happens. I do not mean to invalidate results. I
just want to offer a cause, in case someone is unaware.
What does mmapbench do? It
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:09:18PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> while on the subject, there's a piece of code something like this in
> freebsd:
> /*
> * We hash the name and then some other bit of data that is
> * invariant over the dirhash's lifetime. Otherwise names
>
while on the subject, there's a piece of code something like this in
freebsd:
/*
* We hash the name and then some other bit of data that is
* invariant over the dirhash's lifetime. Otherwise names
* differing only in the last byte are placed close to one
* a
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
> > Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> > > differences to permit openbsd
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
> Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> > differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change
> > the code in a
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
> differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change
> the code in any functional way.
I do not think there is any point in th
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:30:03PM -0800, Thomas G. Knight wrote:
> I saw that you had posted a message regarding the Broadcom 440x drivers.
> I was just wondering if you ever found a driver and if so where at?
>
Take a look at the bfe(4) driver, it supports the Broadcom BCM4401
chips. It's ava
9 matches
Mail list logo
