On Dec 04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! i found a bug in kbdcontrol, it's an buffer overflow, info and patch:
> http://bsdroolz.port5.com/patch
> Its not a serious security problem, just a bug, kbdcontrol is not suid.
> Cya!
Hello,
Thank you. This problem was also reported in
Did you ever get the cd too boot? I'm want to do the same thing with a
kernel that won't fit on a floppy, so this may be my only option. Any
help would be greatly appreciated.
-Marcus
>You would rather use -b with --no-emul-boot. The --no-emul-boot
>flags the boot image as a raw executable r
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:00:47PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: IPFW and the IP stack
> To: "Devon H.O'Dell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
>
> > This is obviously the most logic
I have a couple of ATA133 (UDMA6) disk drives connected to an Intel
ICH5 IDE (parallel ATA) controller. My FreeBSD 4.9-release ATA driver
limits them to ATA33 (UDMA2) without comment. (I.E. There are no
warning messages.) The reason is that when the ata_dmainit() routine
reads the PCI config spa
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
This is obviously the most logical explanation. There's a good bit of
questioning for PFIL_HOOKS to be enabled in generic to allow ipf to be
loaded as a module as well. If this is the case,
Op 4-dec-03 om 15:28 heeft Marko Zec het volgende geschreven:
On Thursday 04 December 2003 15:13, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
I've been looking through the IP stack for shits and giggles and was
wondering why a few things are the way they are with IPFW's
implementation.
I went back through the CVSWeb st
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
> This is obviously the most logical explanation. There's a good bit of
> questioning for PFIL_HOOKS to be enabled in generic to allow ipf to be
> loaded as a module as well. If this is the case, we'll have two
> firewalls that have their hooks compiled i
I've been looking through the IP stack for shits and giggles and was
wondering why a few things are the way they are with IPFW's
implementation.
I went back through the CVSWeb stuff to check out the changes and it
appears that most of my questions are purely cosmetic issues; but I
still don't
Hi! i found a bug in kbdcontrol, it's an buffer overflow, info and patch:
http://bsdroolz.port5.com/patch
Its not a serious security problem, just a bug, kbdcontrol is not suid.
Cya!
(I have tested the bug in FreeBSD 4.8)
Exequiel Rivas
-
Mensaje en
I am developing a device driver for a processing type PCI card on FreeBSD
4.8.
I just can't seem to get my interrupts working. How can I find out what is
going wrong?
1. allocation returns without error
rid = 0;
sc->sc_irq = bus_alloc_resource(dev, SYS_RES_IRQ, &rid,
From: "Soren Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It seems Duncan Barclay wrote:
>[ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Thanks Soren, this seems to work. There is a load of chat about incorrect
>> cable types, but the drives are nice and fast according to a simple dd
>> if=/dev/zero bs
Announcement for 2003-12-04
Topic: EVEN More Follow up to "Simple Rules for Avoiding Spam".
This month, Dec., we are meeting.
The meeting will start at 7:00pm.
Yes, we are starting early.
Directions to the meeting are on the website:
http://www.svbug.com/directions/
Please note the special start
12 matches
Mail list logo
