Hi,
I was adviced to forward here, so that more poeple
can see it. It was originally posted to fs@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
- Forwarded message from "R. Imura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:42:18 +0900
From: "R. Imura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [patch] combine
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, jason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have a problem loading agp. Every time I do load it at boot from
> rc.conf and do a startx the machine hard locks.
One definition of sanity is doing the same thing over and over, and
expecting a different result. :) You should load it i
David Schultz wrote:
Okay, I guess SpecWeb99 is ``real world'' enough for me to justify
the assertion that there is an mmap() performance problem. Just
out of curiosity, how many regions did SpecWeb99 map?
(i.e. what does 'dd if=/proc/$pid/map bs=64k count=1 | wc -l' give?)
The SpecWeb99 benchmark
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003, Vivek Pai wrote:
> Take a look at Figure 6, page 9 in the following:
> http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yruan/DeBox/debox.pdf
>
> On a 1GHz box with 1GB of memory, we were spending
> 4-5 milliseconds per mmap call, and that was limiting
> the throughput of our server on SpecWeb99
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, jason wrote:
> #defineAGP_NVIDIA_3_APBASE0x50
> #defineAGP_NVIDIA_3_APLIMIT0x54
> These are only listed in agpreg.h and agp_nvidia.c, where as all other
> register information(as far as I can tell) is also listed in pcireg.h.
> Is it necessary to have it
#defineAGP_NVIDIA_3_APBASE0x50
#defineAGP_NVIDIA_3_APLIMIT0x54
These are only listed in agpreg.h and agp_nvidia.c, where as all other
register information(as far as I can tell) is also listed in pcireg.h.
Is it necessary to have it listed in both places or is it fine as i
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Vivek Pai wrote:
> Before we proceed on this, I'd like to ask is there actuall a committer
> ready to follow up on this? We currently make our patches available on
> Ping's homepage, and they're relatively clean. He spent a fair bit of
> time getting it from a relatively ugly
Hello everyone,
I have a problem loading agp. Every time I do load it at boot from
rc.conf and do a startx the machine hard locks. So I decided to check
the source code and maybe make some modifications. I have an epox 8rda
with the nforce 2 chipset, and a radeon 8500. I am running 5.1.
I eventually got around to hack scsi_da.c to implement spin down/up on
suspend/resume events of APM or ACPI. Actually the ACPI stuff is
untested and the APM once didn't work properly on my system: one of
the disks, after resume, was misbehaving (hardware errors). A power
toggle fixed the problem,
In a message written on Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 03:13:36PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
> I've never tried to make use of this feature. The manpage for
> dhclient.conf(5) says:
>
> "The fqdn.encoded option may need to be set to on or off, depending
> on the DHCP server you are using."
>
> Which
I have a computer running 5.1-RELEASE and another running
4.9-RELEASE.. Both have the same motherboard with onboard ports/nic,
etc, so conditions should be equal. They both have a printer plugged
in the parallel port. One printer is an HP 5L, the other is an HP 6L,
so that is almost identical a
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:59:29PM +0100, C. Kukulies wrote:
> I installed the spambouncer.org procmail script and before I was switching
> the behaviour from SILENT to COMPLAIN I took a look at my spam.incoming folder
> and found a lot of messages from freebsd-bugs and freebsd-mobile in there.
>
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 06:34:12PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Best I can tell from the config this should make dhclient send a
> dynamic DNS update to the server listed as "primary" in the zone
> section adding hostname.my.example.com. However, tcpdump shows no
> DNS update packets of any kind c
After fsck background check, the system ends up with
dev = ad1s1, block = 1, fs = /mnt/mellan
panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block
irq 1 at atkbd0
panic page fault
And the official Nvidia driver doesnt seems to work..
Cvsuped the tree earlier this day and just wonders if any one know whats w
Hi all,
I have a question concerning the use of malloc to allocate small amounts
of memory for packet wrappers for certain packets.
Basically, I'm using malloc in much the same way as one would use it in
a standard userland program: allocating small chunks and freeing them
again a short(ish) time
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 16:59 schrieb C. Kukulies:
> I installed the spambouncer.org procmail script and before I was switching
> the behaviour from SILENT to COMPLAIN I took a look at my spam.incoming
> folder and found a lot of messages from freebsd-bugs and freebsd-mobile in
> there.
>
> Bo
I installed the spambouncer.org procmail script and before I was switching
the behaviour from SILENT to COMPLAIN I took a look at my spam.incoming folder
and found a lot of messages from freebsd-bugs and freebsd-mobile in there.
Both lists are not directed to folders prior to spambouncer coming in
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:32:30PM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote:
> /-- Wilko Bulte wrote:
> |
> | hi, sorry for jumping in late: what is/is not now in 4.8-stable
> | as far as the patches go to make the Asus P4P800 work?
> |
> | I get as far as:
> |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~: dmesg| grep pcm
> | pcm0
18 matches
Mail list logo
