Before I go any further, I'd like some indication of whether this is
worth pursuing. In particular, if any device driver issues can be
resolved easily, and if the FFLAGS conversion is efficient enough (I'll
look into whether it's better to do this the linux way, or to use
slightly more complicated
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : Are there any other special devices like this in FreeBSD?
: >
: > Rewind units on tape drives? If there's no access check done, and I
: > open the rewind unit as joe-smoe? The close code is what does the
: >
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 12:02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:27, David Malone wrote:
> : > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
> : > > In FreeBSD, this doesn't work; you j
Hi!
I do not know about the C++ part of Kylix, but about the Delphi part, maybe
it could be replaced with FreePascal (http://www.freepascal.org/). There
are even some projects that try to produce an IDE similar to Delphi
(http://www.freepascal.org/links.html).
Has anyone gived a try to FreePasca
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 15:18]:
> H. Which Linux would be most compatible?
>
> At 14:12 10/31/2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> >f7173a.jpg Re Kylix in FreeBSD1.ems >FreeBSD1.ems <0880.0002>>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >* W.
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
> andi payn wrote:
> > First, some background: On Irix and Linux, fam works by asking the
> > kernel to send it a signal whenever the specified accesses occur. On
> > FreeBSD, since there is no imon interface and no dnotify fcntl, it
> > instead wor
Take a look at Figure 6, page 9 in the following:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yruan/DeBox/debox.pdf
On a 1GHz box with 1GB of memory, we were spending
4-5 milliseconds per mmap call, and that was limiting
the throughput of our server on SpecWeb99.
Figure 9 on page 11 shows that just getting rid of
Before we proceed on this, I'd like to ask is there actuall a committer
ready to follow up on this? We currently make our patches available on
Ping's homepage, and they're relatively clean. He spent a fair bit of
time getting it from a relatively ugly set of changes to something more
elegant and be
H. Which Linux would be most compatible?
At 14:12 10/31/2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
>f7173a.jpg Re Kylix in FreeBSD1.emsFreeBSD1.ems <0880.0002>>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 14:45]:
>> Does this mean that
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to implement, in the most unintrusive way, something
> resembliung associative arrays in /bin/sh. I am not interested in
> syntactic sugar, so i am happy to use something like _ as a separator
> between the array basename and the "index", i.
There are two scenarios - sendfile can't proceed immediately because all
sfbuf space is exhausted, and sendfile can't proceed immediately because
the page to be sent isn't in physical memory.
In both cases, we can have another process/thread call sendfile with the
flag cleared, allowing sendfile to
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 14:45]:
> Does this mean that one could possibly develop some GUI programs
> on Linux, them compile them to run on FreeBSD? Or, can one only
> compile command line apps?
This should, in theory, be possible. Kylix links against Qt and some
additional CLX runtim
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:27, David Malone wrote:
: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
: > > In FreeBSD, this doesn't work; you just get EINVAL.
: >
: > I believe this is because of a secur
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: This sounds like one for the NEWBUS people.
A number of people have proposed this in the past.
It is a big deal, and won't be in 5, although a 'treat this pnpid as
that pnpid' might be, which would be suffic
Does this mean that one could possibly develop some GUI programs
on Linux, them compile them to run on FreeBSD? Or, can one only
compile command line apps?
At 11:51 10/31/2003, Michael Edenfield, wrote:
>d87b8c.jpg Re Kylix in FreeBSD.emsFreeBSD.ems <0880.0002>>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charse
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 22:33, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:54:07AM -0800, andi payn typed:
>
> [...]
>
> > * I think (but I'm not sure) that kevent doesn't notify at all if the
> > only change to a file is its ATIME. If I'm right, this makes kevent
> > completely useless for
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:27, David Malone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
> > In FreeBSD, this doesn't work; you just get EINVAL.
>
> I believe this is because of a security problem discovered a few
> years ago, where you could open a file like /dev/io for neith
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:19, Terry Lambert wrote:
> andi payn wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't have anything equivalent to
> > linux's O_NOACCESS (which is not in any of the standard headers, but
> > it's equal to O_WRONLY | O_RDWR, or O_ACCMODE). In linux, this can be
> > used to s
hi again
just for the record: this really seems to be an issue with the ar
device. i took one of the drives off from the promise controller (ar),
attached it to the onboard controller (ad) and everything works fine.
i'm cc'ing to freebsd-hackers because of this post:
http://www.geocrawler.com/m
* jasaorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 04:59]:
> Somebody uses Kylix in FreeBSD?
> What is the performance?
The IDE doesn't run under FreeBSD. I worked on it a bit over this
summer when the most recent Kylix came out, and it appears to rely on
too many Linux-isms.
The command-line tools work just
Hi,
This sounds like one for the NEWBUS people.
BMS
--- Begin Message ---
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hiya
To follow up what I said down the pub...
The file in solaris i was referring to is called /etc/driver_aliases
do a search to find out about it.
Looking at the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
> In FreeBSD, this doesn't work; you just get EINVAL.
I believe this is because of a security problem discovered a few
years ago, where you could open a file like /dev/io for neither
read nor write but still get the special privelages asso
(I hope this is the correct forum for this post; if not, please let me
know where it should go.)
I've found a possible improvement to the implementation of radixsort()
located in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/radixsort.c, which will make the
implementation more efficient when sorting data sets containi
Hello,
whenever I plug my Minolta DIMAGE S414 in my FreeBSD 4.9-stable box,
it crashes with mysterious errors. I have a screenshot at
http://www.steffen-mazanek.de/mixed/images/freebsdscreen.jpg
Is anybody running this digicam on FreeBSD successfully? A -current system
crashed as well, but this
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:43:31AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[snip description of a new 'indexes' builtin]
> Any comments ? Is this interesting enough to be committed
> (with a proper manpage description) ?
> I could provide a flag to "indexes" to return the values instead
> of the names, but i bel
Nielsen wrote:
> Christopher Vance wrote:
> > May I suggest a different feature: the ability to mark an open file
> > (not just its fd) 'remove on close', with permission checked at mark
> > time rather than close time (this status forgotten if not permitted
> > when set) and the unlink actually do
Somebody uses Kylix in FreeBSD?
What is the performance?
Jasao
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
andi payn wrote:
> First, let me mention that I'm not nearly as experienced coding for *BSD
> as for linux, so I may ask some stupid questions.
>
> I've been looking at the fam port, and this has brought up a whole slew
> of questions. I'm not sure if all of them are appropriate to this list,
> bu
[Not sure what is the appropriate forum to discuss this, so
please redirect the discussion if you know where. I have Bcc-ed
a few /bin/sh committers]
I am trying to implement, in the most unintrusive way, something
resembliung associative arrays in /bin/sh. I am not interested in
syntactic sugar
andi payn wrote:
> As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't have anything equivalent to
> linux's O_NOACCESS (which is not in any of the standard headers, but
> it's equal to O_WRONLY | O_RDWR, or O_ACCMODE). In linux, this can be
> used to say, "give me an fd for this file, but don't try to open it f
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:38:33PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Check out the whowatch port.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:01:33PM +, Matt Freitag wrote:
> The closest thing to my knowledge, would probably be "whowatch"
> which resides in /usr/ports/sysutils/whowatch.
> It doesn't allow you to
31 matches
Mail list logo
