Re: Matrox Parhelia XFree86 Busmastering kernel module?

2003-10-11 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 19:56, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote: > > Hiho, > > > > There seems no freebsd-xfree list, but this is only XFree related, > > it's rather kernel oriented. > > > > Matrox offers a RedHat-Linux driver for their Parhelia ba

Re: Matrox Parhelia XFree86 Busmastering kernel module?

2003-10-11 Thread Igor Pokrovsky
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote: > Hiho, > > There seems no freebsd-xfree list, but this is only XFree related, > it's rather kernel oriented. > > Matrox offers a RedHat-Linux driver for their Parhelia based boards > (Parhelia, P650, P750). The XFree86 driver module mt

Re: smallest piece of hardware that runs *BSD?

2003-10-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote: > > Now, we are not far from that. I'm thinking of some CPU with TP Ethernet > > and memory of size of an USB stick. Anyone knowing such or having > > experience? > > Here'

Re: setting sio to even parity failed

2003-10-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:17:13PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > : > In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said: > : > > buf.c_iflag

Re: Dynamic reads without locking.

2003-10-11 Thread Tim Kientzle
Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:31:21PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: On further inspection, I'm pretty sure that sys/kern/subr_devstat.c is not correct. OK. What about the shared page interface? Specifically the comment above devstat_end_transaction(). I'm not entirely happy about

Re: setting sio to even parity failed

2003-10-11 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: : > In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said: : > > buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK; : > > buf.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARODD); : > >

Re: setting sio to even parity failed

2003-10-11 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:33:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said: > > > buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK; > > > buf.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARODD); > > > buf.c_cflag |= CS8 | CL

Re: smallest piece of hardware that runs *BSD?

2003-10-11 Thread Manuel Rabade
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote: > > Now, we are not far from that. I'm thinking of some CPU with TP Ethernet > > and memory of size of an USB stick. Anyone knowing such or having > > experience? > > Here

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: What point? Okay, new rule: if you're going to complain about something, include some supporting details, and a suggestion on how to make things better. Point (I'll sharpen it) -- ../lib is for *what*? Libraries? Putting entire packages and executables in lib directories

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 11:23, Michael Sierchio wrote: Michael Nottebrock wrote: Such as putting packages in /usr/local/lib/ ? I don't get it. Me neither -- the practice of putting entire packages in /usr/local/lib from the ports, such as Mozilla, etc. Mozilla doesn't

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Michael Sierchio wrote: Michael Nottebrock wrote: Such as putting packages in /usr/local/lib/ ? I don't get it. Me neither -- the practice of putting entire packages in /usr/local/lib from the ports, such as Mozilla, etc. Oh. Heh, well. I guess sometimes we could use some kind of /opt after a

Re: smallest piece of hardware that runs *BSD?

2003-10-11 Thread Manuel Rabade
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote: > > Now, we are not far from that. I'm thinking of some CPU with TP Ethernet > > and memory of size of an USB stick. Anyone knowing such or having > > experience? > > Here

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Michael Nottebrock wrote: Such as putting packages in /usr/local/lib/ ? I don't get it. Me neither -- the practice of putting entire packages in /usr/local/lib from the ports, such as Mozilla, etc. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Michael Sierchio wrote: Michael Nottebrock wrote: It's never too late to correct unfortunate decisions. :-) Such as putting packages in /usr/local/lib/ ? I don't get it. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.f

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Michael Nottebrock wrote: It's never too late to correct unfortunate decisions. :-) Such as putting packages in /usr/local/lib/ ? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test /etc/libmap.conf feature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:33:43 +0200 Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the spirit of hier(7). Great to hear about this flashplugin-via-libmap > project, can you provide some details? We'd like to put a HOWTO on > kde-freebsd's homepage, etc. Thank you. Please, please.

Re: smallest piece of hardware that runs *BSD?

2003-10-11 Thread Jim Flowers
> Grab a copy of Embedded Systems Programming, there are ads for > things like this all over near the back of the magazine. In > particular, the chip in whatever USB stick you're looking at > probably has an 8-bit CPU of some sort in it. > Don't remember where I saw it but there is a product

Re: Determining CPU features / cache organization from userland

2003-10-11 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:12:31PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Out of interest, do any systems other than the big-iron Alpha's use L3 > cache? A quick look at the code suggests that only L2 is coloured. L3 cache is present on many MIPS and Pentium Xeon systems, as well as PowerPC G4. > Do any s

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test /etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:00:45 +0200 Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 11 October 2003 09:25, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 03:20, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 02:33, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >

Re: Determining CPU features / cache organization from userland

2003-10-11 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:27:11AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >OS X definitions considered too PowerPC centric. I think the best way >to handle all cases is thus:- > > - Support 3 levels of cache. Out of interest, do any systems other than the big-iron Alpha's use L3 cache? A quick look at the

Re: smallest piece of hardware that runs *BSD?

2003-10-11 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:37:23PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > Grab a copy of Embedded Systems Programming, there are ads for things like > this all over near the back of the magazine. In particular, the chip in > whatever USB stick you're looking at probably has an 8-bit CPU of some > sort in i

Re: Determining CPU features / cache organization from userland

2003-10-11 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:58:27PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >If you do this, it may make sense to use the same names as MacOSX. > > What if your hardware has different linesizes for different caches? I noticed whilst peering in Apple Developer Notes that G5 has 128 byte cache line size, and

Re: Dynamic reads without locking.

2003-10-11 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:31:21PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On further inspection, I'm pretty sure that sys/kern/subr_devstat.c > is not correct. OK. What about the shared page interface? Specifically the comment above devstat_end_transaction(). The generation count is used by the old sysctl i

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test /etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 03:20, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 02:33, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > >>Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > >> > >> > >>> 1. (kde side) Anyone, would you please make a patch for > >>> nspluginscane to look /usr/X11R6/lib/

Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: pelase test/etc/libmap.conffeature on 4-stable

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 02:33, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: 1. (kde side) Anyone, would you please make a patch for nspluginscane to look /usr/X11R6/lib/browsers_plugins? or 2. (pluginwrapper side) If 1 is