On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 01:02 am, Nick Rogness wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > > I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've
> > > discovered what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current
> > > software sup
In a message written on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:43:01PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Leo, you may be able to do this with ipfilter's ipnat. Nat rules are
> traditionally processed with 'ipnat -CF', the -C clears the rules and
> the -F option clears the currently active NAT mappings. You should
>
On Sunday 05 October 2003 01:02 am, Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've
> > discovered what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current
> > software supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmat
On Saturday 04 October 2003 07:21 am, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2003 at 10:17, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to
> > > do a few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable.
> > >
> > >
:FWIW, if you set the machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1, your power will
:go down considerably (our AC inlet power dropped 0.94A @ 110V).
:The performance will also go up considerably.
:
:HTT seems to get a lot of bad press on this list, and its due
:to this sysctl having the wrong default.
Sheesh, nobod
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:32:11AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
> directory. The test looks like this:
>
> if ($filename =~ $directory) {
># yes, this filename resides under directory
> }
>
> This is working for most c
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
> directory. The test looks like this:
>
> if ($filename =~ $directory) {
># yes, this filename resides under directory
> }
>
> This is working for most cases. However, it fails
> I think it might just be easier to do a straight comparison of the first N
> characters of the two strings where N = length of the directory name.
>
> Any suggestions?
You might try index() or substr().
Fred
--
"MOTHER:
Half a word."
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've discovered
> what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current software
> supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmation, and
> comments on
> if it would be hard to impleme
Hi,
I have a perl regex to test if a file resides under a particular
directory. The test looks like this:
if ($filename =~ $directory) {
# yes, this filename resides under directory
}
This is working for most cases. However, it fails is the directory
contains a +. For example:
$filename =
From: Wilko Bulte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:04:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
> > > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > >>I installed Fr
> Depends on how much money you have, but had you considered getting your
> own address range and BGP peering with your ISPs? I'd consider talking
> to them about it. It'll take some time to setup, but it means your
> "switching" is done at the router, not at the NAT box, which is the
> wrong p
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Now, NAT would be required. What I want to do is write an external
application to decide the performance of ISP #1 and ISP#2, and
somehow tell NAT which outside address to use.
Depends on how much money you have, but had you considered getting your
own address range and BGP p
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:04:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >>I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> I'm considering options for a new project, and I think I've discovered
> what I think is the best idea, but I don't think current software
> supports the config. I'd like to get some confirmation, and comments on
> if it would be hard to implement.
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo