Re: isapnp vs pci card: device_probe_and_attach

2003-09-19 Thread soralx
>Isn't there a way so that the PCI card will use another irq >and initialize correctly ? AFAIK, you should be able to assign(reserve) IRQs to ISA in BIOS. 19.09.2003; 21:29:20 [SorAlx] http://cydem.org.ua/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list htt

Re: Throughput problems with NFS between Linux and FreeBSD

2003-09-19 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Richard Sharpe wrote this message on Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:38 -0700: > > We recently encountered a problem with NFS throughput between a FreeBSD > > server (we are using 4.6.2, but the same code seems to be in 5.1 as well). > > > > When using Linu

Gaps in memory usage summary!?

2003-09-19 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
I'm trying to automate the summarization of memory usage on our FreeBSD boxes with the attached little Perl program and have some remaining questions I was not able to answer myself. When run on three representing boxes (all -STABLE and -CURRENT as of yesterday) I get this output:

Re: Throughput problems with NFS between Linux and FreeBSD

2003-09-19 Thread tlambert2
John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Richard Sharpe wrote this message on Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:38 -0700: > > The problem seems to be the following code > > > > if (so->so_type == SOCK_STREAM) > > siz = NFS_MAXPACKET + sizeof (u_long); > > else > > siz = NFS_

isapnp vs pci card: device_probe_and_attach

2003-09-19 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, I have put an older isapnp scsi card in my computer. For this card there is (not yet) a driver for FreeBSD. I also had some pci cards in there of course. When trying to load the driver for the pci card I run into "device_probe_and_attach: %s%d attach returned 6\n" This happens becaus

Re: Throughput problems with NFS between Linux and FreeBSD

2003-09-19 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Richard Sharpe wrote this message on Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:38 -0700: > We recently encountered a problem with NFS throughput between a FreeBSD > server (we are using 4.6.2, but the same code seems to be in 5.1 as well). > > When using Linux 2.4.19 or 2.4.21 as a client, although this might exte

Re: Relinking binaries to new .so libs when versions change?

2003-09-19 Thread Andrew J Caines
Dan, Thanks for your reply. > > Again, a port update of a library has bumped a .so version [in this case > > libatk-1.0.so.200 -> libatk-1.0.so.400]. > how did you update the port? ... Or you could run portupgrade -R, which > will upgrade all the packages dependent on the one you list. # portupg

Throughput problems with NFS between Linux and FreeBSD

2003-09-19 Thread Richard Sharpe
Hi, We recently encountered a problem with NFS throughput between a FreeBSD server (we are using 4.6.2, but the same code seems to be in 5.1 as well). When using Linux 2.4.19 or 2.4.21 as a client, although this might extend to other clients, and copying a large file, you will see the behavior

Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 19 Sep 2003 at 2:24, Terry Lambert wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > If you are using libkse or > > > > libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because > > > > the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting > > > > the loop in libc_r and returning 0 would o

Re: TCP information

2003-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Deepak Jain wrote: > If the tcpcb struct were expanded/changed and the various increments were > added in the appropriate packet pushing code, this would work right? Is > there something non-obvious that one would need to worry about to undertake > such a project? Your overhead would be slightly h

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-19 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-09-16 16:58:06 -0400: > At 10:23 AM -1000 9/16/03, Clifton Royston wrote: > > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some > >simple hack to disregard these wildcard A records, short of > >requesting zone transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via > >peering

Re: TCP information

2003-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Dan Nelson wrote: > > These types of statistics aren't kept. > > > > They usually do not make it into commercial product distributions for > > performance reasons, and because every byte added to a tcpcb > > structure is one byte less that can be used for something else. In > > practice, adding 134

Re: ls patch to sort directories first

2003-09-19 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+-le 18/09/2003 12:05 +0200, Mathieu Arnold écrivait : | Suggestions mostly welcomed :) Maybe I should have sent a PR :) -- Mathieu Arnold pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

mount_unionfs directory permissions.

2003-09-19 Thread Lewis Thompson
Hi, This is the first time I've posted to -hackers and I apologise in advance since it's not strictly what I expect goes on here (and have read on Google Groups). However, the question I want to ask is best answered here, I think. I've been playing with mount_unionfs but get stuck when it come

Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c

2003-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > If you are using libkse or > > > libthr, you will get a partial byte count and not zero because > > > the tape driver returns the (partial) bytes written. So exiting > > > the loop in libc_r and returning 0 would only seem to correct > > > the "problem" for libc_r. > >