Mike Durian wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a serial protocol that is timing sensitive.
> I'm noticing things like drains and reads and blocking until the
> next kernel tick. I believe this is due to the lbolt sleeps
> in the tty.c code.
>
> It looks like I can avoid these sleeps if isbackground
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sendto in send_tcp_raw: sendto(3, packet, 40, 0, X.X.X.X, 16) => No buffer
> space available
Your interface is down. This happens all the time.
If you use PPP on a dialup modem with a normal net connection,
and unplug the modem while you are doing a ping, you will see
Clifton Royston wrote:
> For those who don't know what I'm talking about, try executing "host
> thisdomainhasneverexistedandneverwill.com", or any other domain you'd
> care to make up in .com or .net. Verisign has abused the trust placed
> in them to operate a root name server, by creating wildc
On 17-Sep-2003 Michael Edenfield wrote:
> * John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 21:27]:
>
>> True, we could probably do it. I guess we'd have to generate a few
>> random and unlikely queries, try them, and see if all/most of them
>> resolve to the same address. Or maybe the to the same smal
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 21:27]:
> True, we could probably do it. I guess we'd have to generate a few
> random and unlikely queries, try them, and see if all/most of them
> resolve to the same address. Or maybe the to the same small set of
> addresses, depending on how determin
Hi all
I've got a pppoe gateway with freebsd 5.1-release and two nics : a lan nic
(RFC 1918) and a pppoe nic.
(the same thing append with a 4.7-release...and older versions of nmap)
When I launch nmap to test a machine on the inside : fine !
But when I launch nmap to test a machine on the outside
On 17-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
>: > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
>: > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and ha
* Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:22]:
> I found most of the discussion seems to be going on on NANOG.
> (Apparently they're not the first, BTW; some CC TLDs have been doing it
> for a while, as have some of the new TLDs like .museum. It's just that
> it was a noise-level problem
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:45:42PM -0500, William Michael Grim wrote:
> What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info
> about your problem.
I think he was assuming that we were all aware of the OpenSSH exploit
that was just announced. Mr. Brooks would do well to read
fre
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
: > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
: > filter
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs
> to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and
> comments. The patched code is available from
> http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch
> appear
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:04:17PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Agreed. but it wouldn't be too hard to determine at boot/hourly doing
> a bogus query to find the address of the moment. Even they would be
> hard pressed to change things more than hourly.
In the document VeriSign distributes on
I've had preliminary success with this patch. More testing needs
to be done, but in the meantime, I would appreciate reviews and
comments. The patched code is available from
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/tmp/uthread_write.c and the patch
appears below.
In short, the logic has been changed to en
lter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name
> > servers in the world to do something about this BS.
>
> ISC claims they'll have a patch ready for the stock BIND sometime in the
> next few days for this. All we need to do is import it :)
In particular, see:
the new TLDs like .museum. It's just that
it was a noise-level problem until it affected .com and .net)
The ISC has announced it expects to have a patch by Wednesday.
That's better than I'd hoped. Thanks for all the feedback I've got,
BTW.
<http://apnews.excite.com/artic
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:14]:
> On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> > filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in th
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:12]:
> I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name
> servers in the world to do somethi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
: > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
: > filter it out too. that way
On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name
> servers in the world to do something about this BS
I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name
servers in the world to do something about this BS.
Warner
___
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi,There is a problem when PCMCIA related stuff
: is used as module, ATA CF is not recognized.
:
: This is because PCMCIA atachment is not compiled
: when pccard(4) is not compiled in.
:
: To fix it, we h
OpenSSH_3.6.1p1 FreeBSD-20030916, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090701f
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be trusted.
debug1: Connecting to 10.10.1.23 [10.10.1.23] port 22.
debug1: Connection established
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Soeren Straarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Can there be more than one 'vendor SOMETHING 0x0001 Desc' with different
: SOMETHING and Desc in src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs ?
Of course. That's the whole point of having a vendor space that's
assigned by a cent
I'm trying to implement a serial protocol that is timing sensitive.
I'm noticing things like drains and reads and blocking until the
next kernel tick. I believe this is due to the lbolt sleeps
in the tty.c code.
It looks like I can avoid these sleeps if isbackground() returns
false, however I can
On 2003-Sep-14 18:54:40 +, Zane Long Quentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>the version of FreeBSD is 4.8
>use the dmesg, I found some related information about my usb strorage
>-->begin here
>umass0: Digital , Inc. TGE UFD MP3 Player., rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2
>umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (IO
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Aaron Wohl wrote:
> We have two systems with this motherboard. Id recommend looking for a
> different motherboard. If you find one in the same class let me know
> what you find Im looking too for our next set of servers.
Aaron, I just ordered a supermicro X5DP8 board (and c
On 16-Sep-2003 Dan Langille wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
>> In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
>> to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
>> transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peering with
>> f.root-
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 16:46]:
> On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
> > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
> > to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
> > transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peer
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Clifton Royston wrote:
> In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
> to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
> transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peering with
> f.root-servers.net) and purging those records out of t
At 10:23 AM -1000 9/16/03, Clifton Royston wrote:
In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some
simple hack to disregard these wildcard A records, short of
requesting zone transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via
peering with f.root-servers.net) and purging those records
out of the
On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote:
> In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
> to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
> transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peering with
> f.root-servers.net) and purging those records out
For those who don't know what I'm talking about, try executing "host
thisdomainhasneverexistedandneverwill.com", or any other domain you'd
care to make up in .com or .net. Verisign has abused the trust placed
in them to operate a root name server, by creating wildcard A records
directly under .c
>From: David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic
Yes, I don't think this email will make it to hackers@ because all the
email from
my office gets drop because freebsd.or
Hi,
> #!/bin/bash
> while :; do
> ping -f -s 65467 ip_addr &
> done
So probably mbuf exhaustion.
>
> Here's the NIC info:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x00ed16ec chip=0x12161113 rev=0x11
> hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Accton Technology Corporation'
> device = 'EN5251-Base
>
> Hi,
>
>> #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
>> #1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
>> #2 0xc0168675 in panic (fmt=0xc02db260 "m_copydata, offset > size of
>> mbuf
>> chain") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
>> #3 0xc018576e in m_copydata (m=0xc1
Hi,
> #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
> #1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
> #2 0xc0168675 in panic (fmt=0xc02db260 "m_copydata, offset > size of mbuf
> chain") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
> #3 0xc018576e in m_copydata (m=0xc1560d00, off=
> Do you use any klds? What does kldstat say?
No klds loaded.
Well, it looks like the dc net driver is causing the panic. After some
testing, I got this backtrace:
---
#0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
#2 0xc0168
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, William Michael Grim wrote:
> What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info
> about your problem.
He appears to have made a basic assumption that the readers of -hackers
would subscribe to security-advisories as well.
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeB
From: Josh Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 1. What is the workaround for this issue ? Be creative. Not
> everyone can
> update their userland in a normal fashion - and no, I won't
> sit here and
> justify that statement. Think embedded systems.
>
> 2. Is there really an exploit in the w
* William Michael Grim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 14:46]:
> What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info
> about your problem.
I suspect he means:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/337662/2003-09-13/2003-09-19/0
--Mike
__
What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info
about your problem.
William Michael Grim
Student, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville
Unix Network Administrator, SIUE, Computer Science dept.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Josh Brooks wrote:
>
> 1. What is the workaround
1. What is the workaround for this issue ? Be creative. Not everyone can
update their userland in a normal fashion - and no, I won't sit here and
justify that statement. Think embedded systems.
2. Is there really an exploit in the wild ? Any comments appreciated.
___
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:08:13PM +0300, Murat USTUNTAS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read documents on Vinum for FreeBSD. But, some points exculed.. I want to
> find some points on Vinum..
> If I have identical 2 disks (Samsung SP6300 Series),suppose, I want to
> install the
> FreeBSD on one of them 60
Hello,
I read documents on Vinum for FreeBSD. But, some points exculed.. I want to
find some points on Vinum..
If I have identical 2 disks (Samsung SP6300 Series),suppose, I want to
install the
FreeBSD on one of them 60 Gb. After installing the FreeBSD , I want to run
vinum with mirroring with who
It seems Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> Hi,There is a problem when PCMCIA related stuff
> is used as module, ATA CF is not recognized.
>
> This is because PCMCIA atachment is not compiled
> when pccard(4) is not compiled in.
>
> To fix it, we have to supply PCMCIA attachment
> in any form.
> One way
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:43:19 +0900
Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,There is a problem when PCMCIA related stuff
> is used as module, ATA CF is not recognized.
> This is because PCMCIA atachment is not compiled
> when pccard(4) is not compiled in.
> To fix it, we have to supply PC
Hi,There is a problem when PCMCIA related stuff
is used as module, ATA CF is not recognized.
This is because PCMCIA atachment is not compiled
when pccard(4) is not compiled in.
To fix it, we have to supply PCMCIA attachment
in any form.
One way is to make a kernel module that contains only
ATA/P
Barry Bouwsma wrote:
> Would anyone care to explain why the following simple patch could be
> enough to wedge my machine solid? (My original hack-patches without
> any console printf() debuggery did the same thing within seconds, as
> well...) All it does is notify the console whenever a serial p
--On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 09:07:15 +0100 Matthew Seaman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:16:31AM +0800, maillist bsd wrote:
I am just testing jail on my FreeBSD4.8-stable box, i found i can not
ssh to the jail environment, but i can telnet to jail environment, the
ssh
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:16:31AM +0800, maillist bsd wrote:
> I am just testing jail on my FreeBSD4.8-stable box, i found i can not ssh to the
> jail environment, but i can telnet to jail environment, the sshd is running both
> inside and outside jail. What's the problem.
This is [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, 18:55-0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It appears that pr-55886 is entirely different bug. After applying the
> above patch, I can still get a kernel panic due to mbufs exhaustion.
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack wrote:
> > 1. Can you compile INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT into
51 matches
Mail list logo
