GNATS problem

2003-08-19 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
What's up with GNATS? PR's are not submitted from august 18 evening. Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: pkg_create

2003-08-19 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Adam Balogh wrote: Hello, Has anyone found a solution for the pkg_create problem mentioned here in June? I'm planing to hack pkg_install with other reasons. So, I can take a look on this. Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: >> > This has been answered by somebody on some forum, but I lost it. > >> If you manually dial using cu or tip, what connection speed does the >> modem report? > > Oh geez, pull out the ma

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Diomidis Spinellis wrote: I suggest you first build userland applications that emulate the kernel's networking behavior that affects your protocol. Build and test your protocol in userland on top of that environment, and once you are happy with it, plug it into the kernel. For example, you could u

Re: Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-19 Thread Lars Eighner
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: > > This has been answered by somebody on some forum, but I lost it. > If you manually dial using cu or tip, what connection speed does the > modem report? Oh geez, pull out the manual and spend all night trying to figure out

Re: Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-19 Thread Don Lewis
On 19 Aug, Lars Eighner wrote: > This has been answered by somebody on some forum, but I lost it. > > I have an internal hardware modem. I have configured ppp on demand. > Unfortunately, my 56k modem connects at an effective rate of about > 14.4k when I use ppp under FreeBSD. I have got normal c

Modem won't connect at full speed

2003-08-19 Thread Lars Eighner
This has been answered by somebody on some forum, but I lost it. I have an internal hardware modem. I have configured ppp on demand. Unfortunately, my 56k modem connects at an effective rate of about 14.4k when I use ppp under FreeBSD. I have got normal connect speeds with the same modem and the

Re: Bug FreeBSD 4.8 ATA driver

2003-08-19 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Hi > > I am reading FreeBSD ATA drivers because I want to use them as base for my > ATA driver and I found a total nonsence: in ata-dma.c in FreeBSD 4.8, > there is line > > if (!((pci_read_config(parent,0x40,4)>>(ch->unit<<8))&0x4000)) { > > if ch->

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-19 Thread Ping Pan
Hi, I wrote a socket family SOCK_IPOPTION several years ago, where you can intercept any IP option. In your application, you can open this kind of sockets to receive control messages, and use raw sockets to send. At the same time, use the standard routing sockets to play in the userland. The work

Re: Details

2003-08-19 Thread lutherh
You have reached a non-working email at Strategic Computer Solutions, Inc. If you believe you are getting this message in error, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers T

Bug FreeBSD 4.8 ATA driver

2003-08-19 Thread Mikulas Patocka
Hi I am reading FreeBSD ATA drivers because I want to use them as base for my ATA driver and I found a total nonsence: in ata-dma.c in FreeBSD 4.8, there is line if (!((pci_read_config(parent,0x40,4)>>(ch->unit<<8))&0x4000)) { if ch->unit is 1, config word is shifted by 256 bytes, which gives un

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Orion Hodson
/-- Wilko Bulte wrote: | | hi, sorry for jumping in late: what is/is not now in 4.8-stable | as far as the patches go to make the Asus P4P800 work? | | I get as far as: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~: dmesg| grep pcm | pcm0: port 0xee80-0xeebf,0xe800-0xe8ff mem | 0xfebff400-0xfebff4ff,0xfebff800-0xfeb

Re: new routing protocol

2003-08-19 Thread Diomidis Spinellis
Jerry Toung wrote: > I am in the process of implementing a routing protocol under 5.0. [...] > My problem is dealing with debuging and portability. With this raw approach I > guess I will have to run builkernel and installkernel all the time. How can I > avoid that? I thought about kernel modules,

new routing protocol

2003-08-19 Thread Jerry Toung
dear hackers, I am in the process of implementing a routing protocol under 5.0. This routing protocol is source route based and requires its own header after the ip header and before any other one such as udp,tcp. (ip)(new_rt_hdr)(udp)(paylaod) I am requesting your input as to the

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: > /-- Rudolf Cejka wrote: > | Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): > | > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch > | > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. > | > Maybe just for

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Re: That movie"

2003-08-19 Thread System Anti-Virus Administrator
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: Executable attachment (not allowed) Please contac

Re: pkg_create

2003-08-19 Thread Clifton Royston
[Sorry for the lost references, I'm reading this in digest form.] > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:13:18 -0700 (PDT) > From: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: pkg_create > To: Adam Balogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Ty

Confirmation Request (0472942472)

2003-08-19 Thread CGatePro administration
This is an automated message from the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailing list manager Somebody (probably you) have requested the subscribe(digest) operation for your <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> address If you want to confirm this operation, use the Reply command in your mailer. Check that the Subject of

Warning: E-mail viruses detected

2003-08-19 Thread MailScanner Pironet NDH AG
Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Tue Aug 19 22:30:00 2003 Any infected parts of the message (details.pif) have not been delivered. This message is simply to warn you that your computer system may have a vir

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Re: That movie"

2003-08-19 Thread System Anti-Virus Administrator
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: Executable attachment (not allowed) Please contac

Re: pkg_create

2003-08-19 Thread Julian Elischer
There weas no resolution though I discoverred that teh mechanism for the bug is that the "-C" argument is applied to tar immediatly that such a line is encounterred on teh arg list or the pascking list. the answer would be to not put the "-C" arg on the 'tar' list until a file to save is actually

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Re: Yourapplication"

2003-08-19 Thread System Anti-Virus Administrator
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: Attachment disallowed (2) Please contact your I.T

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Orion Hodson
/-- Rudolf Cejka wrote: | Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): | > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch | > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. | > Maybe just for "defensive programming" wouldn't it be "safer" to switch | > values ins

Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic

2003-08-19 Thread sysadmin
> What version of uipc_mbuf.c and mbuf.h are present on your system? > > Thanks, > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack uipc_mbuf.c: $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v 1.51.2.32 2003/08/10 21:51:41 silby Exp $ mbuf.h: $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.44.2.21 2003/08/10 21:51:41 silby Exp $ Thanks,

pkg_create

2003-08-19 Thread Adam Balogh
Hello, Has anyone found a solution for the pkg_create problem mentioned here in June? The original discussion. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-June/001673.html Cheers, Adam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: GEOM Gate.

2003-08-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Attila Nagy wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > It works on firewire and it works on a dual port RAID array (as a > > separate box containing the RAID array). > > What does 'it' means? I guess it's not UFS, but the pure ability of > sharing a device on a bus, connected to more than one adapters. Th

Re: nmbclusters and nmbufs

2003-08-19 Thread Maxim Konovalov
-questions material indeed. On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, 11:53+0400, Varshavchick Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > Can anybody advise please if I want to increase nmbclusters option in > kernel, can I just type > sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" > without rebooting the server, or is the only way to se

Re: GEOM Gate.

2003-08-19 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan Nelson writes: >I think this just demonstrates that you should not run benchmarks with >all your debugging flags enabled :) Most people will not be running >production systems with WITNESS, and parts of the kernel that bog down >under the heavy load of WITNESS

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. > Maybe just for "defensive programming" wouldn't it be "safer" to switch > values instead of assignment? Maybe there ar

nmbclusters and nmbufs

2003-08-19 Thread Varshavchick Alexander
Hi, Can anybody advise please if I want to increase nmbclusters option in kernel, can I just type sysctl kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" without rebooting the server, or is the only way to set the NMBCLUSTERS option in kernel, install the new kernel and reboot? And secondly, also I need to i